Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | August, Diane; Artzi, Lauren; Barr, Christopher |
---|---|
Titel | Helping ELLs Meet Standards in English Language Arts and Science: An Intervention Focused on Academic Vocabulary |
Quelle | In: Reading & Writing Quarterly, 32 (2016) 4, S.373-396 (24 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
Zusatzinformation | Weitere Informationen |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 1057-3569 |
DOI | 10.1080/10573569.2015.1039738 |
Schlagwörter | English Language Learners; Language Arts; Common Core State Standards; Academic Discourse; Vocabulary Development; Teaching Methods; Spanish Speaking; Elementary School Teachers; Elementary School Students; Grade 3; Grade 4; Poverty; Instructional Effectiveness; Reading Instruction; Discussion (Teaching Technique); Intervention; Reinforcement; Comparative Analysis; Statistical Analysis; English (Second Language); Second Language Learning; Pretests Posttests Sprachkultur; Common core curriculum; Curriculum; Kerncurriculum; Discourse; Diskurs; Wortschatzarbeit; Teaching method; Lehrmethode; Unterrichtsmethode; Elementary school; Teacher; Teachers; Grundschule; Volksschule; Lehrer; Lehrerin; Lehrende; School year 03; 3. Schuljahr; Schuljahr 03; School year 04; 4. Schuljahr; Schuljahr 04; Armut; Unterrichtserfolg; Leseunterricht; Positive Verstärkung; Statistische Analyse; English as second language; English; Second Language; Englisch als Zweitsprache; Zweitsprachenerwerb |
Abstract | The Common Core State Standards and the Next Generation Science Standards require students to understand and produce academic language that appears in informational text. Vocabulary is a critical domain of academic language, but English language learners (ELLs) come to the English Language Arts classroom with more limited English vocabulary than their English-proficient peers. This study compared 2 methods of vocabulary instruction: extended vocabulary instruction and embedded vocabulary instruction. Teachers implemented both approaches in the context of interactive shared reading, in which teachers and students read and discussed informational text. A total of 30 teachers in 18 schools and 509 third- and fourth-grade Spanish-speaking ELLs in a large, high-poverty district in the southwestern United States participated. Findings indicate that although extended instruction was the more effective approach, embedded instruction also helped ELLs acquire general academic and domain-specific vocabulary--an important finding, given that embedded instruction requires considerably less instructional time. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2020/1/01 |