The Genre of Instructor Feedback in Doctoral Programs: A Corpus Linguistic Analysis

Autor/inn/en	Walters, Kelley Jo; Henry, Patricia; Vinella, Michael; Wells, Steve; Shaw, Melanie; Miller, James
Titel	The Genre of Instructor Feedback in Doctoral Programs: A Corpus Linguistic Analysis
Quelle	In: International Journal on E-Learning, 14 (2015) 4, S.525-550 (26 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1537-2456
Schlagwörter	Computational Linguistics; Feedback (Response); Graduate Students; College Faculty; Writing (Composition); Benchmarking; Learning Processes; Coding; Online Courses; Research Papers (Students); Grammar; Academic Discourse; Teacher Student Relationship; Doctoral Programs; Computer Mediated Communication; Qualitative Research; Discourse Analysis; Language Styles; Writing Assignments + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Linguistics; Computerlinguistik; Graduate Study; Student; Students; Aufbaustudium; Graduiertenstudium; Hauptstudium; Studentin; Fakultät; Schreibübung; Learning process; Lernprozess; Codierung; Programmierung; Online course; Online-Kurs; Grammatik; Discourse; Diskurs; Teacher student relationships; Lehrer-Schüler-Beziehung; Doktorandenprogramm; Computerkonferenz; Qualitative Forschung; Diskursanalyse; Sprachstil
Abstract	Providing transparent written feedback to doctoral students is essential to the learning process and preparation for the capstone. The purpose of this study was to conduct a qualitative exploration of faculty feedback on benchmark written assignments across multiple, online doctoral programs. The Corpus for this analysis included 236 doctoral level written assignments that contained feedback from 51 faculty members. Student papers submitted between January and December 2011 were retrieved from courses. Using MOVE structure analysis, common themes were identified and coded from embedded feedback on papers. Four types of embedded feedback were identified and coded into two major components, mechanical and conceptual feedback. Key findings indicate that online doctoral instructors focus first on meeting assignment requirements, and then on building students' scholarly tone and research effectiveness. Emphasis was also on APA, mechanics, and grammar while still other areas included results of instructor error or lack of clarity in providing correct directions and explanations. This valuable study indicates the level and types of faculty feedback on student doctoral work allowing for universities to better understand additional sources of support for students on successful completion of the capstone as well as support for faculty in understanding the importance of the type of embedded feedback they can provide to support online doctoral students. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education. P.O. Box 1545, Chesapeake, VA 23327. Tel: 757-366-5606; Fax: 703-997-8760; e-mail: info@aace.org; Web site: http://www.aace.org
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01