What Deters Students from Studying Abroad? Evidence from Four European Countries and Its Implications for Higher Education Policy

Autor/in	Netz, Nicolai
Titel	What Deters Students from Studying Abroad? Evidence from Four European Countries and Its Implications for Higher Education Policy
Quelle	In: Higher Education Policy, 28 (2015) 2, S.151-174 (24 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0952-8733
DOI	10.1057/hep.2013.37
Schlagwörter	Foreign Countries; Study Abroad; Models; Regression (Statistics); Higher Education; Educational Policy; Barriers; Political Issues; Access to Education; Student Mobility; Decision Making; Comparative Analysis; Austria; Germany; Netherlands; Switzerland + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Ausland; Studies abroad; Auslandsstudium; Analogiemodell; Regression; Regressionsanalyse; Hochschulbildung; Hochschulsystem; Hochschulwesen; Politics of education; Bildungspolitik; Politischer Faktor; Education; Access; Bildung; Zugang; Bildungszugang; Student; Students; Mobility; Schüler; Schülerin; Studentin; Mobilität; Decision-making; Entscheidungsfindung; Österreich; Deutschland; Niederlande; Schweiz
Abstract	This study examines factors that deter students in Austria, Germany, Switzerland and the Netherlands from studying abroad. Using an adaptation of the Rubicon model of action phases, the path to gaining study abroad experience is conceptualised as a process involving two thresholds: the decision threshold and the realisation threshold. Theoretical predictions drawn from rational choice, migration and reproduction theories are integrated into this framework. On the basis of nationally representative and internationally comparable student survey data, logistic regressions are calculated for the two thresholds. Five implications for higher education policy are derived: First, the fact that there are various obstacles to studying abroad means that some students may face multiple disadvantages and might therefore need additional support. Second, mobility schemes might have to reflect better that obstacles at the decision threshold differ from obstacles at the realisation threshold. Third, the self-perpetuating nature of mobility makes the moments of political intervention crucial. Fourth, the similarity of obstacles between countries suggests certain supranational initiatives. Finally, the achievability of the European mobility targets could be discussed, as increasing mobility and creating equitable access to it might be conflicting goals. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Palgrave Macmillan. Brunel Road, Houndmills, Bassingstoke, Hampshire, RG21 6XS, UK. Tel: +44-1256-357893; Fax: +44-1256-328339; e-mail: subscriptions@palgrave.com; Web site: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/hep/index.html
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01