Assessing the Impact of a Wildlife Education Program on Japanese Attitudes and Behavioral Intentions

Autor/inn/en	Sakurai, Ryo; Jacobson, Susan K.; Matsuda, Naoko; Maruyama, Tetsuya
Titel	Assessing the Impact of a Wildlife Education Program on Japanese Attitudes and Behavioral Intentions
Quelle	In: Environmental Education Research, 21 (2015) 4, S.542-555 (14 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1350-4622
DOI	10.1080/13504622.2014.898246
Schlagwörter	Foreign Countries; Attitude Measures; Intention; Behavior; Wildlife; Consciousness Raising; Program Effectiveness; Natural Resources; Conflict; Prevention; Attitude Change; Comparative Analysis; Control Groups; Experimental Groups; Surveys; Self Control; Community Programs; Social Attitudes; Social Influences; Predictor Variables; Formative Evaluation; Seminars; Meetings; Field Trips; Questionnaires; Risk; Knowledge Level; Trust (Psychology); Statistical Analysis; Quasiexperimental Design; Japan + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Ausland; Bewusstseinsbildung; Natural Ressource; Natürliche Ressource; Konflikt; Prävention; Vorbeugung; Attitudinal change; Einstellungsänderung; Survey; Umfrage; Befragung; Selbstbeherrschung; Social attidude; Soziale Einstellung; Sozialer Einfluss; Prädiktor; Seminar; Meeting; Tagung; Exkursion; Fragebogen; Risiko; Wissensbasis; Statistische Analyse
Abstract	Human-wildlife conflicts are common in agricultural communities and mountainous villages in Japan. Tochigi prefecture has one of the highest amounts of agricultural damage caused by wildlife in the country. To reduce conflicts, the Nature Preservation Division of Tochigi Prefecture launched a wildlife damage prevention program. We evaluated the effects of this program on residents' attitudes and behavioral intentions by comparing a model district receiving the treatment program to a nearby control district. We conducted a survey of all households registered either in the residential organization or telephone book in each district (n?=?423), with a 46% response rate. The model district did not differ from the control except for greater perceived behavioral control regarding wildlife damage among residents in the model district (F?=?3.83, df?=?1, p?=?0.05). An unanticipated outcome was the development of a community-based wildlife group in the model district. In both model and control districts, subjective norm (perceived social pressure to engage or not to engage in a behavior) was the strongest predictor of behavioral intentions, unlike results of studies conducted in the US. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 325 Chestnut Street Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Fax: 215-625-2940; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01