Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Klauer, Karl Christoph; Singmann, Henrik |
---|---|
Titel | Does Logic Feel Good? Testing for Intuitive Detection of Logicality in Syllogistic Reasoning |
Quelle | In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39 (2013) 4, S.1265-1273 (9 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 0278-7393 |
DOI | 10.1037/a0030530 |
Schlagwörter | Replication (Evaluation); Logical Thinking; Likert Scales; Educational Experiments; Experimental Groups; Control Groups; Teaching Methods; Educational Practices; Educational Strategies; College Students; Cohort Analysis; Foreign Countries; Germany |
Abstract | Recent research on syllogistic reasoning suggests that the logical status (valid vs. invalid) of even difficult syllogisms can be intuitively detected via small changes in affective state (Morsanyi & Handley, 2012). In a series of 6 experiments, we replicated effects of logical status on liking ratings of difficult syllogisms (although their shape differs from that reported by Morsanyi and Handley), and we tested 2 alternative accounts of our and Morsanyi and Handley's findings in terms of surface features accidentally confounded with logical status: the partial-repetition hypothesis and the content-effects hypothesis. The results support the content-effects hypothesis, according to which the effects of logical status reflect differences in mean liking for the presented conclusions rather than effects of logical status itself. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | American Psychological Association. Journals Department, 750 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20002. Tel: 800-374-2721; Tel: 202-336-5510; Fax: 202-336-5502; e-mail: order@apa.org; Web site: http://www.apa.org |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2020/1/01 |