Federal School Improvement Grants (SIGs): How Capacity and Local Conditions Matter

Autor/inn/en	Yatsko, Sarah; Lake, Robin; Bowen, Melissa; Cooley Nelson, Elizabeth
Titel	Federal School Improvement Grants (SIGs): How Capacity and Local Conditions Matter
Quelle	In: Peabody Journal of Education, 90 (2015) 1, S.27-52 (26 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0161-956X
DOI	10.1080/0161956X.2015.988523
Schlagwörter	Federal Aid; Federal Programs; Educational Improvement; Incentive Grants; Program Effectiveness; Program Evaluation; Audits (Verification); Educational Assessment; Educational Indicators; Program Implementation; Fidelity; Educational Change; School Effectiveness; School Turnaround; Interviews; State Officials; Unions; Superintendents; Principals; Teacher Attitudes; Administrator Attitudes; Scheduling; Organizational Communication; Administrative Organization; Educational Administration; Change Strategies; Educational Practices; Barriers; Performance Factors; Intervention; School Culture; Staff Utilization; Funding Formulas; Strategic Planning; State Surveys; School Districts; School Surveys; Elementary Secondary Education; Washington + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Teaching improvement; Unterrichtsentwicklung; Finanzieller Anreiz; Programme evaluation; Programmevaluation; Education; assessment; Bewertungssystem; Educational indicato; Bildungsindikator; Bildungsreform; Schuleffizienz; Interviewing; Interviewtechnik; Member of the government; Regierungsmitglied; Schulrat; Principal; Schulleiter; Lehrerverhalten; Disposition; Bildungsverwaltung; Schuladministration; Schulverwaltung; Lösungsstrategie; Bildungspraxis; Leistungsindikator; Schulkultur; Schulleben; Deployment of labor; Deployment of labour; Personaleinsatz; Funding; Finanzierung; Strategy; Planning; Strategie; Planung; School district; Schulbezirk
Abstract	In 2009, the federal government committed over $3 billion nationwide to help states and districts turn around their worst-performing schools. The U.S. Department of Education intended for the School Improvement Grants (SIGs) to spur dramatic change.This report looks at the results of a field study of the first-year implementation of those grants in Washington State, which received $50 million in SIG funding over three years. Researchers hoped to see what school-level changes were underway, how they compared to the intent of the grants, and the early role that districts played in SIG implementation.The report provides findings from the state, district, and school level. Researchers found that, with some exceptions, districts and schools in Washington State are approaching the turnaround work in ways only marginally different from past school improvement efforts. Despite the hard work of administrators, principals, and especially teachers, the majority of schools studied show little evidence of the type of bold and transformative changes the SIGs were intended to produce. The report offers recommendations regarding the roles that federal, state, and local education agencies should play in support of school turnaround work. Those administering future grants targeted at the nation's lowest-performing schools could avoid the problems described here and improve their chances of affecting dramatic, not incremental, change. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 325 Chestnut Street Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Fax: 215-625-2940; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01