Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Paiva, Andrea L.; Amoyal, Nicole R.; Johnson, Janet L.; Prochaska, James O. |
---|---|
Titel | Adolescent Substance Use Initiation: Correlates of the Profiles of Prevention |
Quelle | In: Journal of Early Adolescence, 34 (2014) 8, S.1033-1057 (25 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 0272-4316 |
DOI | 10.1177/0272431613519497 |
Schlagwörter | Early Adolescents; Substance Abuse; Smoking; Drinking; Risk; Peer Influence; Family Influence; Multivariate Analysis; Predictor Variables; Resilience (Psychology); Prevention; Behavior; Individual Characteristics; Social Influences; Effect Size; Grade 9; Surveys; Intervention; Experimental Groups; Control Groups; Comparative Analysis; Exercise; Stress Management; Dietetics; Eating Habits; Decision Making; Racial Differences; Gender Differences; Likert Scales Drug use; Drug consomption; Drogenkonsum; Rauchen; Trinken; Risiko; Multivariate Analyse; Prädiktor; Prävention; Vorbeugung; Personality characteristic; Personality traits; Persönlichkeitsmerkmal; Sozialer Einfluss; School year 09; 9. Schuljahr; Schuljahr 09; Survey; Umfrage; Befragung; Übung; Stressmanagement; Stressbewältigung; Ernährungslehre; Ernährungsgewohnheit; Essgewohnheit; Decision-making; Entscheidungsfindung; Rassenunterschied; Geschlechterkonflikt; Likert-Skala |
Abstract | Using cluster analysis, 717 students who reported that they had never smoked and the nondrinking 292 students who reported that they had never drank alcohol were classified into four profile groups based on their Pros and Cons of not using and temptation to use. Profiles were labeled Most Protected, Least Positive, Most Negative, and Most Tempted. Profile groups differed significantly on peer pressure, family communication, and use of 11 Transtheoretical Model (TTM) processes of prevention, and applied experiential and behavioral strategies to prevent the onset of smoking and alcohol use. The largest and most consistent differences were on the processes with the Most Protected using more than the Least Positive and Most Tempted groups. Being more actively engaged with the processes of prevention helps to explain why the Most Protected group has had the least amount of substance use over time while the Most Tempted and Least Positive groups had the highest rates of substance use. The consistency and size of differences on the processes support the hypothesis that Most Protected youth may be those who proactively protect themselves from substance use initiation. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: http://sagepub.com |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2017/4/10 |