Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/in | Rosenthal, Daniel M. |
---|---|
Titel | What Education Reformers Should Do about Collective Bargaining |
Quelle | In: Phi Delta Kappan, 95 (2014) 5, S.58-62 (5 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 0031-7217 |
Schlagwörter | Collective Bargaining; Educational Change; Change Agents; Change Strategies; Advocacy; Personnel Policy; Personnel Management; School District Autonomy; Participative Decision Making; Accountability; Teacher Administrator Relationship; Labor Legislation; Elementary Secondary Education; District of Columbia; Indiana; New Jersey; Ohio; Wisconsin |
Abstract | Restrictions on collective bargaining are spreading. But while reformers are right to question current labor practices in education, they're wrong to believe that bargaining prohibitions will solve the problems. A smarter approach would begin by putting down the sledgehammer wielded in Wisconsin and picking up a scalpel by pushing for laws aimed at two goals: (a) Clarifying or expanding the category of permissive bargaining topics, without eliminating mandatory bargaining on fundamental terms and conditions of employment; and (b) Ensuring that collective bargaining is transparent and that local government officials are accountable for their decisions in bargaining. Reformers should also focus on advocacy for policy change at the local level. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Phi Delta Kappa International. 408 North Union Street, P.O. Box 789, Bloomington, IN 47402. Tel: 800-766-1156; Fax: 812-339-0018; e-mail: orders@pdkintl.org; Web site: http://www.pdkintl.org/publications/pubshome.htm |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2017/4/10 |