Composite Reliability of a Workplace-Based Assessment Toolbox for Postgraduate Medical Education

Autor/inn/en	Moonen-van Loon, J. M. W.; Overeem, K.; Donkers, H. H. L. M.; van der Vleuten, C. P. M.; Driessen, E. W.
Titel	Composite Reliability of a Workplace-Based Assessment Toolbox for Postgraduate Medical Education
Quelle	In: Advances in Health Sciences Education, 18 (2013) 5, S.1087-1102 (16 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1382-4996
DOI	10.1007/s10459-013-9450-z
Schlagwörter	Graduate Students; Graduate Study; Graduate Medical Education; Generalizability Theory; Feedback (Response); Evaluation Methods; Reliability; Observation; Portfolios (Background Materials) + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Graduate Study; Student; Students; Aufbaustudium; Graduiertenstudium; Hauptstudium; Studentin; Reliabilität; Beobachtung
Abstract	In recent years, postgraduate assessment programmes around the world have embraced workplace-based assessment (WBA) and its related tools. Despite their widespread use, results of studies on the validity and reliability of these tools have been variable. Although in many countries decisions about residents' continuation of training and certification as a specialist are based on the composite results of different WBAs collected in a portfolio, to our knowledge, the reliability of such a WBA toolbox has never been investigated. Using generalisability theory, we analysed the separate and composite reliability of three WBA tools [mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (mini-CEX), direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS), and multisource feedback (MSF)] included in a resident portfolio. G-studies and D-studies of 12,779 WBAs from a total of 953 residents showed that a reliability coefficient of 0.80 was obtained for eight mini-CEXs, nine DOPS, and nine MSF rounds, whilst the same reliability was found for seven mini-CEXs, eight DOPS, and one MSF when combined in a portfolio. At the end of the first year of residency a portfolio with five mini-CEXs, six DOPS, and one MSF afforded reliable judgement. The results support the conclusion that several WBA tools combined in a portfolio can be a feasible and reliable method for high-stakes judgements. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Springer. 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-348-4505; e-mail: service-ny@springer.com; Web site: http://www.springerlink.com
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10