Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Großschedl, Jörg; Mahler, Daniela; Kleickmann, Thilo; Harms, Ute |
---|---|
Titel | Content-Related Knowledge of Biology Teachers from Secondary Schools: Structure and Learning Opportunities |
Quelle | In: International Journal of Science Education, 36 (2014) 14, S.2335-2366 (32 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 0950-0693 |
DOI | 10.1080/09500693.2014.923949 |
Schlagwörter | Foreign Countries; Pedagogical Content Knowledge; Secondary School Teachers; Curriculum Development; Item Response Theory; Correlation; Educational Opportunities; Teacher Education; Faculty Development; Statistical Analysis; Regression (Statistics); Biology; Science Instruction; Teaching Experience; Secondary School Students; Germany Ausland; Pädagogische Kompetenz; Curriculum; Development; Curriculumentwicklung; Lehrplan; Entwicklung; Item-Response-Theorie; Korrelation; Bildungsangebot; Bildungschance; Lehrerausbildung; Lehrerbildung; Statistische Analyse; Regression; Regressionsanalyse; Biologie; Teaching of science; Science education; Natural sciences Lessons; Naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht; Sekundarschüler; Deutschland |
Abstract | Teachers' content-related knowledge is a key factor influencing the learning progress of students. Different models of content-related knowledge have been proposed by educational researchers; most of them take into account three categories: content knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge, and curricular knowledge. As there is no consensus about the empirical separability (i.e. empirical structure) of content-related knowledge yet, a total of 134 biology teachers from secondary schools completed three tests which were to capture each of the three categories of content-related knowledge. The empirical structure of content-related knowledge was analyzed by Rasch analysis, which suggests content-related knowledge to be composed of (1) content knowledge, (2) pedagogical content knowledge, and (3) curricular knowledge. Pedagogical content knowledge and curricular knowledge are highly related (r[subscript latent]?=?0.70). The latent correlations between content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge (r[subscript latent] =?0.48)--and curricular knowledge, respectively (r[subscript latent]?=?0.35)--are moderate to low (all ps?<?0.001). Beyond the empirical structure of content-related knowledge, different learning opportunities for teachers were investigated with regard to their relationship to content knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge, and curricular knowledge acquisition. Our results show that an in-depth training in teacher education, professional development, and teacher self-study are positively related to particular categories of content-related knowledge. Furthermore, our results indicate that teaching experience is negatively related to curricular knowledge, compared to no significant relationship with content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 325 Chestnut Street Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Fax: 215-625-2940; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2017/4/10 |