From "Culturally Deprived" to "At Risk": The Politics of Popular Expression and Educational Inequality in the United States, 1960-1985

Autor/inn/en	Martinez, Sylvia L. M.; Rury, John L.
Titel	From "Culturally Deprived" to "At Risk": The Politics of Popular Expression and Educational Inequality in the United States, 1960-1985
Quelle	In: Teachers College Record, 114 (2012) 6, (31 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1467-9620
Schlagwörter	Equal Education; Outcomes of Education; Federal Programs; Disadvantaged; Social Class; Social Capital; Social Change; Cultural Capital; Politics of Education; Language Role; Educational History; Mass Media; Achievement Gap; Educational Attainment; Racial Differences; Ethnic Groups; Low Income Groups; Minority Group Students; Educational Environment; At Risk Students; Academic Achievement; Educational Practices; Educational Strategies; Educational Policy; African Americans; Mexican Americans + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Lernleistung; Schulerfolg; Social classes; Soziale Klasse; Sozialkapital; Sozialer Wandel; Educational policy; Bildungspolitik; History of education; Bildungsgeschichte; Massenmedien; Bildungsabschluss; Bildungsgut; Rassenunterschied; Ethnie; Lernumgebung; Pädagogische Umwelt; Schulumwelt; Schulleistung; Bildungspraxis; Lehrstrategie; Politics of education; Afroamerikaner; Hispanoamerikaner
Abstract	This article examines the terms "culturally deprived" and "disadvantaged" in light of their popular use in the sixties and following decades, particularly in the ethnic and mainstream press. These expressions represented an effort to explain differences in educational attainment and academic achievement along lines of social class, race, and ethnicity from an environmental, liberal viewpoint. We consider the use of such terms from the standpoint of both the African American and Mexican American communities at the time, representing perspectives from the North, South, and West Coast. In doing this, we document a national effort by educators and the concerned public to comprehend and address long-standing patterns of social and educational inequity. State and federal programs that used "compensatory" and "remedial" education to address the problems of "culturally deprived" and "disadvantaged" communities are also considered, along with political tensions within and between the African American and Mexican American communities over benefits to be gained. The use of these expressions was eventually marked by controversy as ethnic communities and academic critics labeled them a new form of prejudice, based on conceptions of cultural and academic inadequacy. While the terms fell out of favor, a new generation was left with the problem of explaining persistent differences in educational outcomes and academic achievement that marked children's lives. The expression "at risk" was brought into the mainstream, and the academic terms "social capital" and "cultural capital" were introduced and gained currency. While these new terms have not sparked the controversies of the past, they fail to fully characterize the systematic educational disadvantages experienced by children from poor or minority backgrounds. The article closes with a brief discussion of the recurring dilemma of how best to describe persistently unequal educational outcomes, particularly when they continue to correspond to broad patterns of social and economic inequality in contemporary society. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Teachers College, Columbia University. P.O. Box 103, 525 West 120th Street, New York, NY 10027. Tel: 212-678-3774; Fax: 212-678-6619; e-mail: tcr@tc.edu; Web site: http://www.tcrecord.org
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10