Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Dadey, Nathan; Gong, Brian |
---|---|
Institution | Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium |
Titel | An Introduction to Considerations for Through-Year Assessment Programs: Purposes, Design, Development, Evaluation |
Quelle | (2023), (49 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Monographie |
Schlagwörter | Student Evaluation; Progress Monitoring; Summative Evaluation; Standardized Tests; Educational Assessment; Program Design; Testing; Evaluation Methods; Instruction; State Standards; Theories; Validity; Test Construction; Test Content; Program Evaluation; Educational Legislation; Elementary Secondary Education; Federal Legislation Schulnote; Studentische Bewertung; Standadised tests; Standardisierter Test; Education; assessment; Bewertungssystem; Programme design; Programmaufbau; Programmplanung; Testdurchführung; Testen; Teaching process; Unterrichtsprozess; Theory; Theorie; Gültigkeit; Testaufbau; Testaufgabe; Programme evaluation; Programmevaluation; Bildungsrecht; Schulgesetz; Bundesrecht |
Abstract | This document is written primarily for policy makers and state department of education staff who are considering through-year assessments, as well as consultants and contractors state departments rely on. The document identifies essential things to consider when designing or evaluating a through-year assessment program. The paper is organized into five sections. The first section provides a definition of through-year assessment, the main motivations and purposes for through-year assessments, and the tools for specifying an assessment design, including theories of action, claims, and validity arguments. The second section describes key design aspects that every through-year assessment program must address, and some options for those design aspects that distinguish through-year models. The third section discusses emerging examples of specific through-year assessment designs in terms of their design choices, challenges, and trade-offs. The fourth section provides suggestions for evaluating through-year assessment programs that go beyond current evaluation requirements for state summative assessments, such as federal Peer Review. The fifth and final section provides conclusions and a view to the future. (ERIC). |
Anmerkungen | Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium. e-mail: info@smarterbalanced.org; Web site: http://www.smarterbalanced.org |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2024/1/01 |