Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/in | Sunderman, Gail L. |
---|---|
Institution | University of Colorado at Boulder, National Education Policy Center |
Titel | NEPC Review: "Leveraging ESSA to Support Quality-School Growth" |
Quelle | (2017), (10 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Monographie |
Schlagwörter | Stellungnahme; Educational Legislation; Federal Legislation; Educational Change; Educational Quality; Educational Improvement; Program Effectiveness; Financial Support; Charter Schools; School Turnaround; State Government; School Districts; Models; Evidence; Educational Policy; Accountability Bildungsrecht; Schulgesetz; Bundesrecht; Bildungsreform; Quality of education; Bildungsqualität; Teaching improvement; Unterrichtsentwicklung; Finanzielle Förderung; Charter school; Charter-Schule; Bund-Länder-Beziehung; School district; Schulbezirk; Analogiemodell; Evidenz; Politics of education; Bildungspolitik; Verantwortung |
Abstract | A recent report offers a how-to guide for reform advocates interested in removing communities' democratic control over their schools. The report explains how these reformers can influence states to use the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) Title I school improvement funds to support a specific set of reforms: charter schools, state-initiated turnarounds, and appointment of an individual with plenipotentiary authority over districts or schools. While the report acknowledges that the research evidence on the effectiveness of these reforms as school improvement strategies is limited, it uses a few exceptional cases to explain how advocates seeking to influence the development of state ESSA plans can advance them anyway. As this review explains, support for the effectiveness of these approaches is simply too limited to present them as promising school improvement strategies. The report omits research that evaluates the models relative to other school reform initiatives, and it fails to take into account the opportunity costs of pursuing one set of policies over another. It also relies on test-score outcomes as the sole measure of success, thus ignoring other impacts these strategies may have on students and their local communities or the local school systems where they occur. For these reasons, policymakers, educators and state education administrators should be wary of relying on this report to guide them as they develop their state improvement plans and consider potential strategies for assisting low-performing schools and districts. A list of notes and resources is provided. [For "Leveraging ESSA to Support Quality-School Growth" (2017), see ED583109.] (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | National Education Policy Center. School of Education 249 UCB University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309. Tel: 303-735-5290; e-mail: nepc@colorado.edu; Web site: http://nepc.colorado.edu |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2020/1/01 |