Comparative Effectiveness of WestEd's iRAISE Professional Development: An Interim Report of a Randomized Experiment in Michigan and Pennsylvania

Autor/inn/en	Schellinger, Adam M.; Toby, Megan; Jaciw, Andrew P.; Zacamy, Jenna
Institution	Empirical Education Inc.; WestEd
Titel	Comparative Effectiveness of WestEd's iRAISE Professional Development: An Interim Report of a Randomized Experiment in Michigan and Pennsylvania
Quelle	(2015), (36 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Monographie
Schlagwörter	Comparative Analysis; Program Effectiveness; Randomized Controlled Trials; Experimental Programs; Reading Programs; Online Courses; Electronic Learning; Literacy; Reading Achievement; High School Students; Science Education; Content Area Reading; Pilot Projects; Performance Factors; Outcomes of Education; Fidelity; Teacher Surveys; Administrator Surveys; Interviews; Faculty Development; Observation; Educational Attitudes; Feedback (Response); Pennsylvania; Michigan + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Erprobungsprogramm; Online course; Online-Kurs; Alphabetisierung; Schreib- und Lesefähigkeit; Leseleistung; High school; High schools; Student; Students; Oberschule; Schüler; Schülerin; Studentin; Naturwissenschaftliche Bildung; Sinnerfassendes Lesen; Pilot project; Modellversuch; Pilotprojekt; Leistungsindikator; Lernleistung; Schulerfolg; Interviewing; Interviewtechnik; Beobachtung; Educational attitude; Bildungsverhalten; Erziehungseinstellung
Abstract	Empirical Education Inc. is the independent evaluator of WestEd's 2012 i3 Development grant for Internet-based Reading Apprenticeship Improving Science Education (iRAISE). This interim report provides an update on the progress of the randomized control trial (RCT) during the 2014-2015 school year. The RCT measures the impact of iRAISE on student reading literacy, as measured by the Educational Testing Service (ETS) literacy assessment, in high school science classes in 27 schools in Michigan and Pennsylvania. This report provides a summary of the 2013-2014 pilot study and its relationship to the RCT, the design summary and research questions for the RCT, an updated study timeline, preliminary results for fidelity of implementation (FOI), and initial teacher impressions from the monthly teacher surveys. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Empirical Education Inc. 425 Sherman Avenue Suite 210, Palo Alto, CA 94306. Tel: 650-328-1734; Fax: 650-328-1794; e-mail: contact@empiricaleducation.com; Web site: http://www.empiricaleducation.com
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01