Lead Turnaround Partners: How the Emerging Marketplace of Lead Turnaround Partners Is Changing School Improvement

Autor/in	Corbett, Julie
Institution	Center on Innovation & Improvement (CII)
Titel	Lead Turnaround Partners: How the Emerging Marketplace of Lead Turnaround Partners Is Changing School Improvement
Quelle	(2011), (56 Seiten) PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Monographie
Schlagwörter	Partnerships in Education; School Turnaround; Educational Change; Educational Improvement; Grants; School Surveys; Interviews; Content Analysis; Position Papers; State Agencies; Program Implementation; Administrator Attitudes; Agency Role; Definitions; Educational Responsibility; Educational Planning; Strategic Planning; Government Role; Sustainability; Federal Legislation; Research Needs; Educational Administration; Educational Practices; Colorado; Hawaii; Illinois; Indiana; Massachusetts; New York; Tennessee; Virginia + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Hochschulpartnerschaft; Bildungsreform; Teaching improvement; Unterrichtsentwicklung; Grant; Finanzielle Beihilfe; Interviewing; Interviewtechnik; Inhaltsanalyse; Positionspapier; Öffentliche Einrichtung; Begriffsbestimmung; Erziehungsverantwortung; Bildungsplanung; Strategy; Planning; Strategie; Planung; Nachhaltigkeit; Bundesrecht; Forschungsbedarf; Bildungsverwaltung; Schuladministration; Schulverwaltung; Bildungspraxis; Master-Studiengang
Abstract	This report describes the use of Lead Turnaround Partners (LTPs) in the current School Improvement Grant (SIG) program and provides the results of document review, surveys, and interviews with eight State Education Agencies and seven Lead Turnaround Partner organizations. The study focuses on the implementation of the transformation and turnaround models under the SIG program during the 2010-2011 school year. The current marketplace of Lead Turnaround Partner (LTP) providers and the organizational structures of existing LTPs are explored. In addition, the communication strategies and the roles of various players involved in aspects of SIG implementation, including State Education Agencies (SEAs), Local Education Agencies (LEAs) and LTPs are discussed. Lessons learned and recommendations for improvement for each entity are summarized. Document review, surveys, and interviews were gathered/conducted from/with: Colorado, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Massachusetts, New York, Tennessee, and Virginia. Document review, surveys, and interviews were gathered/conducted from/with the following LTPs: Academy for Urban School Leadership (AUSL), America's Choice, Cambridge Education, EdisonLearning, Learning Point Associates/AIR, Pearson School Achievement Services, and WestED. Based on the findings, this report offers recommendations for states; districts; the field; states, districts, and LTPs; and the U.S. Department of Education (USED) and states. An appendix provides LTP profiles. (ERIC).
Anmerkungen	Academic Development Institute. 121 North Kickapoo Street, Lincoln, IL 62656. Tel: 217-732-6462; Fax: 217-732-3696; e-mail: editor@adi.org; Web site: http://www.adi.org
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01