Suche

Wo soll gesucht werden?
Erweiterte Literatursuche

Ariadne Pfad:

Inhalt

Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige

 
Autor/inn/enPolanin, Joshua R.; Tanner-Smith, Emily E.; Hennessy, Emily A.
TitelEstimating the Difference between Published and Unpublished Effect Sizes: A Meta-Review
Quelle(2016), (48 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext (1); PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei (2) Verfügbarkeit 
ZusatzinformationWeitere Informationen
Spracheenglisch
Dokumenttypgedruckt; online; Monographie
DOI10.3102/0034654315582067
SchlagwörterPublications; Periodicals; Bias; Effect Size; Meta Analysis; Research Problems; Literature Reviews; Information Dissemination; Coding; Robustness (Statistics); Regression (Statistics); Educational Research; Psychology
AbstractPractitioners and policymakers rely on meta-analyses to inform decision-making around the allocation of resources to individuals and organizations. It is therefore paramount to consider the validity of these results. A well-documented threat to the validity of research synthesis results is the presence of publication bias, a phenomenon where studies with large and/or statistically significant effects, relative to studies with small or null effects, are more likely to be published (Rothstein, Borenstein, & Sutton, 2005). We investigated this phenomenon empirically by reviewing meta-analyses published in top tier journals between 1986-2013 that quantified the difference between effect sizes from published and unpublished research. We reviewed 383 meta-analyses of which 81 had sufficient information to calculate an effect size. Results indicated that published studies yielded larger effect sizes than those from unpublished studies (d-bar = 0.18, 95% CI [0.10, 0.25]). Moderator analyses revealed that the difference was larger in meta-analyses that included a wide range of unpublished literature. We conclude that intervention researchers require continued support to publish null findings and that meta-analyses should include unpublished studies to mitigate the potential bias from publication status. [This article was published in: "Review of Educational Research" v86 n1 p207-236 Mar 2016 (EJ1090515).] (As Provided).
Erfasst vonERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update2020/1/01
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
 

Standortunabhängige Dienste
Da keine ISBN zur Verfügung steht, konnte leider kein (weiterer) URL generiert werden.
Bitte rufen Sie die Eingabemaske des Karlsruher Virtuellen Katalogs (KVK) auf
Dort haben Sie die Möglichkeit, in zahlreichen Bibliothekskatalogen selbst zu recherchieren.
Tipps zum Auffinden elektronischer Volltexte im Video-Tutorial

Trefferlisten Einstellungen

Permalink als QR-Code

Permalink als QR-Code

Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)

Teile diese Seite: