Suche

Wo soll gesucht werden?
Erweiterte Literatursuche

Ariadne Pfad:

Inhalt

Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige

 
Autor/inn/enKobrin, Jennifer L.; Shaw, Emily J.
InstitutionCollege Board
TitelAn Exploration of L1, L2, and Bilingual Students' Writing Features on the SAT Essay
Slides presented at Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME) n (Vancouver, BC, Apr 14, 2012).
Quelle(2012), (17 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit 
Spracheenglisch
Dokumenttypgedruckt; online; Monographie
SchlagwörterKonferenzschrift; Nachschlagewerk; Bilingualism; English (Second Language); Second Language Learning; Scores; Regression (Statistics); Writing Tests; Prior Learning; College Entrance Examinations; Cultural Background; Language Proficiency; Role; Essays; Language Styles; Native Language; Language Dominance; Prompting; Writing Evaluation; Language Usage; Persuasive Discourse; Test Construction; Coding; Cultural Differences; Writing Instruction; High School Students; SAT (College Admission Test)
AbstractIt is well-documented that students' prior knowledge, cultural background, and language proficiency play a role in how they read, interpret, and respond to writing tasks (Barkaoui, 2007; Connor & Kramer, 1995; Hinkel, 2002). Essays written by students from different language backgrounds often differ in their linguistic, stylistic, and rhetorical characteristics and these features may affect the scores that students receive. This study explored the features of essays written on the SAT by students for whom English was not their best language (L2 students) and bilingual students who reported both English and another language as their best language, compared to students for whom English was solely their best language (L1 students). A sample of essay responses on 14 different prompts administered between October 2005 and January 2006 were coded on a variety of features including number of words, use of first-person voice, use of a five-paragraph structure, and types of examples offered (e.g., scholarly or personal experience). Multilevel logistic regression analyses indicated that L2 students had greater odds of using first-person and using personal experience in their essay responses; and had lesser odds of taking a mixed argument approach in responding to the essay prompt. There was substantial variability in the frequency of essay features by language group across prompt, suggesting that different prompts elicit responses with different features. The implications for test development and student instruction are discussed. (As Provided).
AnmerkungenCollege Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org
Erfasst vonERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update2020/1/01
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
 

Standortunabhängige Dienste
Da keine ISBN zur Verfügung steht, konnte leider kein (weiterer) URL generiert werden.
Bitte rufen Sie die Eingabemaske des Karlsruher Virtuellen Katalogs (KVK) auf
Dort haben Sie die Möglichkeit, in zahlreichen Bibliothekskatalogen selbst zu recherchieren.
Tipps zum Auffinden elektronischer Volltexte im Video-Tutorial

Trefferlisten Einstellungen

Permalink als QR-Code

Permalink als QR-Code

Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)

Teile diese Seite: