Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Park, Bitnara Jasmine; Anderson, Daniel; Irvin, P. Shawn; Alonzo, Julie; Tindal, Gerald |
---|---|
Institution | University of Oregon, Behavioral Research and Teaching (BRT) |
Titel | Diagnostic Efficiency of easyCBM Reading: Oregon. Technical Report #1106 |
Quelle | (2011), (1519 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Monographie |
Schlagwörter | Quantitative Daten; Intervention; Diagnostic Tests; Response to Intervention; At Risk Students; Scores; Cutting Scores; Screening Tests; Reading Tests; School Districts; Prediction; Measurement Techniques; Classification; State Standards; Formative Evaluation; Benchmarking; Reading Fluency; Reading Comprehension; Vocabulary Development; Knowledge Level; Oregon |
Abstract | Within a response to intervention (RTI) framework, students are typically identified as "academically at-risk" if they score below a specified cut-point on a benchmark screener. Students identified as at-risk are provided with an intervention intended to increase achievement. In the following technical report, we describe a process for choosing appropriate cut-points on the benchmark screener and then apply this process to the easyCBM[R] reading benchmark tests using a sample from three districts in Oregon. The most appropriate cut-point may vary dramatically by the population assessed and the criterion used to establish "true" risk. The diagnostic efficiency of easyCBM[R] is evaluated with respect to the cut-points and the overall effectiveness of the measures to correctly predict student classification (meeting/not meeting standards) on the Oregon state test. Results are presented for both the full sample and for each of seven different subgroups, when n[greater than or equal]50. (Contains 1 figure.) (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Behavioral Research and Teaching. 175 Lokey Education 5262 University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403. Tel: 541-346-3535; Fax: 541-346-5689; Web site: http://www.brtprojects.org |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2017/4/10 |