Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/in | Lips, Dan |
---|---|
Institution | Heritage Foundation |
Titel | Ten Reasons Why the "Economic Stimulus" Should Not Include Education Spending. Backgrounder. No. 2233 |
Quelle | (2009), (6 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Monographie |
Schlagwörter | Economic Progress; Elementary Secondary Education; Early Childhood Education; Educational Finance; Federal Programs; Educational Change; Public Education; Postsecondary Education; Federal Legislation; Federal Aid; Budgeting; Retrenchment; Economic Climate; Financial Exigency; Financial Problems; Economic Factors; Science Education; Technology Education; Engineering Education; Mathematics Education Economic growth; Wirtschaftswachstum; Early childhood; Education; Frühkindliche Bildung; Frühpädagogik; Bildungsfonds; Bildungsreform; Öffentliche Erziehung; Post-secondary education; Tertiäre Bildung; Bundesrecht; Wirtschaftslage; Finanzielle Härte; Ökonomischer Faktor; Naturwissenschaftliche Bildung; Technisch-naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht; Ingenieurausbildung; Mathematische Bildung |
Abstract | House Democrats recently unveiled draft legislation for the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. Widely touted as an economic stimulus package, the $825 billion draft legislation included as much as $142 billion for education. This includes the creation of a $79 billion State Fiscal Stabilization Fund to assist state governments in providing public education and other services. The act also includes significant spending increases for current and proposed federal programs for K-12, postsecondary, and early childhood education. This approach is bad economic policy and bad education policy. An unprecedented federal spending increase for education will not improve economic growth--and past experience strongly suggests that this plan will not improve American educational performance. Instead of a massive federal spending increase, Congress should embrace fiscally responsible solutions to help states meet fiscal challenges and improve educational services. This paper discusses the top ten reasons why this spending plan is the wrong approach. (Contains 22 footnotes.) (ERIC). |
Anmerkungen | Heritage Foundation. 214 Massachusetts Avenue NE, Washington, DC 20002-4999. Tel: 202-546-4400; Fax: 202-546-8328; e-mail: info@heritage.org; Web site: http://www.heritage.org |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2017/4/10 |