Suche

Wo soll gesucht werden?
Erweiterte Literatursuche

Ariadne Pfad:

Inhalt

Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige

 
Autor/inn/enKim, Jason J.; Crasco, Linda M.; Blank, Rolf K.; Smithson, John
InstitutionWisconsin Center for Education Research, Madison.; Council of Chief State School Officers, Washington, DC.; Systemic Research, Inc., Norwood, MA.
TitelSurvey Results of Urban School Classroom Practices in Mathematics and Science: 2000 Report. Using the Survey of Enacted Curriculum Conducted during Eight USI Site Visits. How Reform Works: An Evaluative Study of National Science Foundation's Urban Systemic Initiatives. Study Monograph No. 3.
Quelle(2001), (94 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit 
Spracheenglisch
Dokumenttypgedruckt; online; Monographie
ISBN0-9702968-3-5
SchlagwörterQuantitative Daten; Academic Achievement; Active Learning; Classroom Techniques; Curriculum Development; Educational Change; Educational Technology; Elementary Secondary Education; Evaluation Methods; Experiential Learning; Faculty Development; Higher Education; Homework; Mathematics Instruction; Preservice Teacher Education; Program Effectiveness; Program Evaluation; Science Instruction; Small Group Instruction; Student Evaluation; Teaching Methods; Thinking Skills; Time Management; Urban Schools
AbstractThis report presents results from eight Urban Systemic Initiative (USI) school district surveys conducted during 1999 and 2000. The Survey of Enacted Curriculum is the study component of a National Science Foundation grant on how reform works in USI districts. The study explores the impact of USI programs on student achievement and the learning infrastructure in urban school districts. It will develop an inferential causal model linking USI drivers and other key elements. In addition to classroom practices, the survey collects data on teachers' preservice and inservice education experiences, comparing results from elementary and middle school teachers who received varying amounts of professional development. Some of the findings include: most USI teachers were actively involved in professional development, which focused on content standards, in-depth study of content, curriculum implementation, multiple assessment strategies, and new teaching methods. In science, teachers with high professional development levels reported greater use of multiple assessments than teachers with low professional development levels, particularly elementary teachers. For science and mathematics, state and district frameworks or standards had the greatest positive influence on curriculum, as well as national standards. In this context, differences between teachers with high and low professional development levels were not notable. Appendixes contain content maps, descriptions of instructional activities, descriptive data on teachers participating in the survey, and expectations for students in mathematics and science. (SM)
AnmerkungenFor full text: http://www.systemic.com/publication or http://www.siurbanstudy.org/newspublication.
Erfasst vonERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
 

Standortunabhängige Dienste
Die Wikipedia-ISBN-Suche verweist direkt auf eine Bezugsquelle Ihrer Wahl.
Tipps zum Auffinden elektronischer Volltexte im Video-Tutorial

Trefferlisten Einstellungen

Permalink als QR-Code

Permalink als QR-Code

Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)

Teile diese Seite: