Measures of Progress: 1995 Project Follow-Up, Los Rios Community College District (American River College, Cosumnes River College, Sacramento City College). Results of a Survey of 1993-94 Graduates and Non-Returning Students. Volume I of II--Frequencies and Percents by District, College and Academic Program.

Autor/inn/en	Beachler, Judith A.; Pagtalunan, Jose
Institution	Los Rios Community Coll. District, Sacramento, CA. Office of Planning and Research.
Titel	Measures of Progress: 1995 Project Follow-Up, Los Rios Community College District (American River College, Cosumnes River College, Sacramento City College). Results of a Survey of 1993-94 Graduates and Non-Returning Students. Volume I of II--Frequencies and Percents by District, College and Academic Program.
Quelle	(1995), (233 Seiten) PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Monographie
Schlagwörter	Quantitative Daten; College Graduates; College Outcomes Assessment; Community Colleges; Dropouts; Graduate Surveys; Majors (Students); Multicampus Districts; Participant Satisfaction; Program Effectiveness; Student Educational Objectives; Two Year College Students; Two Year Colleges; Vocational Followup + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Hochschulabsolvent; Hochschulabsolventin; Community college; Community College; Drop-out; Drop-outs; Dropout; Early leavers; Schulversagen
Abstract	In 1995, the three colleges in California's Los Rios Community College District (LRCCD) surveyed 6,151 former students from 1993-94 to gather information on student outcomes and characteristics. This report presents districtwide findings related to the frequencies and percents of responses by academic program. Following an executive summary and the survey instruments used by the District's three colleges (American River College, Cosumnes River College, Sacramento City College), a general discussion is provided of survey methodology, indicating that surveys were sent to all graduates and certificate earners and a random sample of non-returning students who had not graduated. Tables are then provided of the survey response rate, indicating that responses were received from 2,389 former students, and overall responses for all academic programs. The next section provides data tables showing responses for occupational education programs, including: accounting, administration of justice, automotive mechanics technology, automotive technology, aviation maintenance technology, business, communications media, computer information science, dental hygiene, drafting technology, early childhood education, electronics technology, engineering, environmental control technology, fire technology, health information technology, horticulture, human services, interior design, legal assisting, management, medical assisting, nursing, occupational therapy assisting, office administration, real estate, and social services assisting. Responses are then presented for general programs, including art, general education or transfer/liberal arts, humanities, interdisciplinary studies, mathematics, physical education, science, and social sciences. The final section presents tables of responses for undeclared students. (HAA)
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC