Suche

Wo soll gesucht werden?
Erweiterte Literatursuche

Ariadne Pfad:

Inhalt

Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige

 
Autor/inFenwick, Tara J.
TitelAssessing Adult Learning Using Portfolios.
Quelle(1996), (16 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit 
BeigabenTabellen
Spracheenglisch
Dokumenttypgedruckt; online; Monographie
SchlagwörterTagungsbericht; Leitfaden; Unterricht; Lehrer; Adult Education; Adult Learning; Adult Students; Evaluation Methods; Foreign Countries; Informal Assessment; Portfolio Assessment; Portfolios (Background Materials); Self Evaluation (Individuals); Student Evaluation
AbstractA portfolio is a folder assembled by the learner, containing samples of the learner's work collected over a period of time. The kinds of items reflect the nature of the course content. Each individual who decides to use a portfolio approach must develop unique expectations, guidelines for content, and assessment criteria suitable for the purpose of the course and the objective of student involvement in the portfolio activity. A suggested series of steps when beginning to use the portfolio is as follows: (1) decide what is to be collected, by whom, and when; (2) spend time introducing portfolios to learners; (3) hold periodic conferences with learners; (4) grade portfolios holistically; and (5) spend time responding to learners. Benefits of using portfolios include the following: portfolios show learner growth over time; they involve learners directly in their own learning and evaluation; they show the process of learning, not just the outcomes; they build learner confidence; they are holistic measures of learning; they are a learning experience in themselves; they are useful for learners seeking employment; they are useful indicators of gaps in the program; and they are an effective means of faculty development. Potential concerns are as follows: the uncertainty of their validity, learner choice of a work sample not being representative of the predetermined outcomes, additional time required of instructor for evaluation, ambiguous process of evaluation method, and student skepticism. (Appendixes contain a sample format for holistic grading of a portfolio and 10 references.) (YLB)
Erfasst vonERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update2004/1/01
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
 

Standortunabhängige Dienste
Da keine ISBN zur Verfügung steht, konnte leider kein (weiterer) URL generiert werden.
Bitte rufen Sie die Eingabemaske des Karlsruher Virtuellen Katalogs (KVK) auf
Dort haben Sie die Möglichkeit, in zahlreichen Bibliothekskatalogen selbst zu recherchieren.
Tipps zum Auffinden elektronischer Volltexte im Video-Tutorial

Trefferlisten Einstellungen

Permalink als QR-Code

Permalink als QR-Code

Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)

Teile diese Seite: