Suche

Wo soll gesucht werden?
Erweiterte Literatursuche

Ariadne Pfad:

Inhalt

Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige

 
Autor/inn/enSperazi, Laura; Jurmo, Paul
InstitutionLiteracy Partnerships, East Brunswick, NJ.
TitelTeam Evaluation: Case Studies from Seven Workplace Education Programs.
Quelle(1994), (409 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit 
BeigabenTabellen
Spracheenglisch
Dokumenttypgedruckt; online; Monographie
SchlagwörterAdult Basic Education; Case Studies; Cooperation; Cooperative Planning; Evaluation Methods; Literacy Education; Participative Decision Making; Program Design; Program Development; Program Effectiveness; Program Evaluation; Team Training; Teamwork; Workplace Literacy
AbstractThis document presents key findings about the team evaluation process used in seven workplace basic skills programs in 1993 and 1994. An introduction summarizes the methodology used to develop the case studies and key findings about the team evaluation process. These key findings present the strengths and challenges of using evaluation teams, along with recommendations for those interested in trying this approach. Recommendations include the following: evaluation teams need to create time, interest, expertise, a supportive context, a code of confidentiality, and an ethic of continuous improvement; teams need to customize the process to fit it to the site's unique needs and opportunities; teams should clarify evaluation's role in the larger program planning process; teams should develop evaluation procedures consonant with the company's culture; teams should use familiar and accessible resources; and teams need to be realistic. Six case studies describe how the team evaluation process was used in seven workplace education programs: Bull Worldwide Information Systems; Datatec Industries; Haartz Corporation; Norton Company; Project REACH; and Victoria General Hospital. Each case study follows this format: program background (history, goals, and description); background on the team (history and stakeholders represented); the process which the team went through; reflections and various appendixes, such as sample data-gathering instruments or reports generated by the teams. (YLB)
Erfasst vonERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update2004/1/01
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
 

Standortunabhängige Dienste
Da keine ISBN zur Verfügung steht, konnte leider kein (weiterer) URL generiert werden.
Bitte rufen Sie die Eingabemaske des Karlsruher Virtuellen Katalogs (KVK) auf
Dort haben Sie die Möglichkeit, in zahlreichen Bibliothekskatalogen selbst zu recherchieren.
Tipps zum Auffinden elektronischer Volltexte im Video-Tutorial

Trefferlisten Einstellungen

Permalink als QR-Code

Permalink als QR-Code

Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)

Teile diese Seite: