Ohio At-Risk Linkage Team Project. A Report on Three State Team Projects. Linkage Survey. Linkage Workshop for Local Teams. Identification of Exemplary Local Linkages.

Autor/inn/en	Imel, Susan; Sandoval, Gloria T.
Institution	Ohio State Univ., Columbus. Center on Education and Training for Employment.
Titel	Ohio At-Risk Linkage Team Project. A Report on Three State Team Projects. Linkage Survey. Linkage Workshop for Local Teams. Identification of Exemplary Local Linkages.
Quelle	(1990), (240 Seiten) PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Monographie
Schlagwörter	Adult Basic Education; Adult Education; Agency Cooperation; At Risk Persons; Cooperative Planning; Human Services; Interviews; Job Training; Program Development; Secondary Education; State Agencies; State Departments of Education; Surveys; Vocational Education; Workshops; Ohio + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Adult; Adults; Education; Adult education; Erwachsenenbildung; Adult basic education; Adult training; Risikogruppe; Humanitäre Hilfe; Interviewing; Interviewtechnik; Berufsqualifizierender Bildungsgang; Programmplanung; Sekundarbereich; Öffentliche Einrichtung; Kultusministerium; Survey; Umfrage; Befragung; Ausbildung; Berufsbildung; Lernwerkstatt; Schulung
Abstract	To implement an action plan developed during an institute on building linkages for at-risk youth and adults through vocational technical education, a team of representatives from the Ohio Departments of Education and Human Services undertook three activities. First, a survey was sent to 832 Ohio educators and human services personnel to identify the status of targeted linkages relevant to serving LEAP (Learning, Earning, and Parenting) and JOBS (Job Opportunities and Basic Skills) participants. A total of 417 usable responses were analyzed. Respondents identified exemplary linkages with other programs serving JOBS and LEAP participants, strategies to link programs, barriers to linkages, types of assistance to strengthen networks, and interest in attending an interagency team workshop. Second, an interagency linkage workshop attended by 15 local teams was conducted. Thirteen teams completed action plans. Technical assistance was provided through roundtable discussion, and a resource notebook was distributed. Third, to identify exemplary local linkages, the team collected information through telephone interviews with selected survey respondents and workshop attendees. Responses were synthesized into a list of tips for developing successful linkages. (Appendixes amounting to over half the report include the action plan, survey instrument, workshop materials, linkage teams' action plans, and interview schedules.) (YLB)
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC