1989 Program Evaluations. Maryland Community Colleges.

Institution	Maryland State Board for Community Colleges, Annapolis.
Titel	1989 Program Evaluations. Maryland Community Colleges.
Quelle	(1990), (238 Seiten)Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; Monographie
Schlagwörter	College Graduates; Community Colleges; Educational Assessment; Enrollment; Enrollment Trends; Job Placement; Office Occupations Education; Outcomes of Education; Program Evaluation; State Surveys; Statewide Planning; Two Year Colleges; Vocational Education; Maryland + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Hochschulabsolvent; Hochschulabsolventin; Community college; Community College; Education; assessment; Bewertungssystem; Einschulung; Employment service; Employment services; Arbeitsvermittlung; Büro- und Verwaltungsschule; Lernleistung; Schulerfolg; Programme evaluation; Programmevaluation; Planwirtschaft; Ausbildung; Berufsbildung
Abstract	The Maryland Community College Program Evaluation System is based on a quantitative review of community college program information by the State Board for Community Colleges and a subsequent qualitative assessment conducted by the individual community colleges in response to specific questions raised by the board. This document first presents the results of a statewide evaluation of the Office Technologies programs, followed by a section presenting the results of individual community college evaluations of programs throughout the community college system. The evaluation of Office Technologies programs includes descriptive information on the programs offered at all 17 community colleges in the system, an analysis of trends in enrollments and student characteristics, program performance data, results of evaluations conducted by the colleges, and recommendations regarding program offerings and improvements. The section on qualitative evaluations contains 40 program reports completed by the 17 individual colleges. For each program, the following information is provided: (1) the name of the college, the program, and the level of award; (2) responses to the board's questions concerning graduate placement and follow-up, program quality, and the causes of the identified problems; (3) actions planned by the college to remedy the problems; and (4) board recomendations. (JMC)
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC