Suche

Wo soll gesucht werden?
Erweiterte Literatursuche

Ariadne Pfad:

Inhalt

Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige

 
Autor/inn/enLytle, Susan L.; Wolfe, Marcie
InstitutionERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education, Columbus, OH.
TitelAdult Literacy Education: Program Evaluation and Learner Assessment. Information Series No. 338.
Quelle(1989), (86 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit 
ReiheERIC Publications
Spracheenglisch
Dokumenttypgedruckt; online; Monographie
SchlagwörterAdult Basic Education; Adult Educators; Adult Learning; Adult Literacy; Competency Based Education; Educational Policy; Evaluation Methods; Evaluation Research; Functional Literacy; Literacy Education; Measures (Individuals); Program Evaluation; Reading Tests; Standardized Tests; Student Evaluation; Student Participation
AbstractAdult literacy programs need reliable information about program quality and effectiveness for accountability, improvement of practice, and expansion of knowledge. Evaluation and assessment reflect fundamental beliefs about adult learners, concepts of literacy, and educational settings. Resources for planning program evaluations include surveys, handbooks, instruments, and policy studies. Evaluation issues include the following: (1) program goals and mission are subject to scrutiny and change; (2) data about teaching and learning are essential; (3) expanded outcome measures for learner progress are needed; and (4) the roles of staff, managers, learners, and external evaluators affect the evaluation process and outcomes. Four major approaches to learner assessment are considered: (1) standardized testing is norm referenced and cost effective; (2) materials-based assessment is commercially available and follows a systems management model; (3) competency-based assessment involves real-life tasks, predetermined performance standards, a continuum of difficulty, and a range of strategies; and (4) participatory assessment allows learners an active role and involves a range of texts, tasks, contexts, and strategies. Evaluation should: (1) be both external and internal; (2) be both formative and summative; (3) involve learners and staff; (4) generate design questions from theory, research, evaluation, and practice; (5) involve critical reflection on program philosophy and goals; (6) give prominence to the processes of teaching and learning; (7) capture a range of learner and program outcomes; (8) require a variety of longitudinal data collection methods; (9) be integrated with program functions; and (10) be systematic and systemic. (131 references) (SK)
AnmerkungenPublications Office, Center on Education and Training for Employment, 1900 Kenny Road, Columbus, OH 43210-1090 (order no. IN338: $8.75).
Erfasst vonERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update2004/1/01
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
 

Standortunabhängige Dienste
Da keine ISBN zur Verfügung steht, konnte leider kein (weiterer) URL generiert werden.
Bitte rufen Sie die Eingabemaske des Karlsruher Virtuellen Katalogs (KVK) auf
Dort haben Sie die Möglichkeit, in zahlreichen Bibliothekskatalogen selbst zu recherchieren.
Tipps zum Auffinden elektronischer Volltexte im Video-Tutorial

Trefferlisten Einstellungen

Permalink als QR-Code

Permalink als QR-Code

Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)

Teile diese Seite: