Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
| Autor/in | Schneider, Michael J. |
|---|---|
| Titel | Argument and Science. |
| Quelle | (1979), (17 Seiten) |
| Beigaben | Tabellen |
| Sprache | englisch |
| Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; Monographie |
| Schlagwörter | Tagungsbericht; Stellungnahme; Communication (Thought Transfer); Persuasive Discourse; Philosophy; Sciences; Speech Communication; Theories |
| Abstract | This paper contends that views of science as "objectivist" or "subjectivist" not only represent inaccurate and extreme positions on a continuum but also obscure the importance of argument in the scientific enterprise. It examines the role of argument in the objectivist view of science by exploring the analysis of Henry Johnstone, Jr., of the differences between philosophical and scientific rationality. Next, the paper illustrates the role of argument in the subjectivist view and considers the attack on the objectivist view. Finally, it argues that weaknesses in the subjectivist scheme suggest a more moderate view of science in which scientific rationality is grounded in a combination of argumentation and empirical verification. (FL) |
| Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
| Update | 2004/1/01 |
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
Permalink als QR-Code
Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)
Teile diese Seite:
