Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Hall, Eugene R.; und weitere |
---|---|
Institution | Naval Training Analysis and Evaluation Group, Orlando, FL. |
Titel | A Comparative Assessment of Three Methods of Collecting Training Feedback Information. TAEG Report No. 64. Final Report. |
Quelle | (1978), (122 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Monographie |
Schlagwörter | Competence; Cost Effectiveness; Equivalency Tests; Evaluation Methods; Interviews; Job Skills; Job Training; Military Training; Multiple Choice Tests; Personnel Evaluation; Postsecondary Education; Questionnaires; Rating Scales; Research Reports; Supervisors; Technical Occupations Kompetenz; Kosten-Nutzen-Analyse; Kosten-Nutzen-Denken; Interviewing; Interviewtechnik; Produktive Fertigkeit; Berufsqualifizierender Bildungsgang; Militärausbildung; Multiple choice examinations; Multiple-choice tests, Multiple-choice examinations; Multiple-Choice-Verfahren; Personalbeurteilung; Post-secondary education; Tertiäre Bildung; Fragebogen; Rating-Skala; Research report; Forschungsbericht; Technical occupation; Technischer Beruf |
Abstract | Three methods of obtaining training feedback data from recent Atlanta Fleet technician school graduates and their fleet supervisors were compared: (1) a mailout questionnaire; (2) a structured interview; and (3) a job knowledge test. The results demonstrated that the questionnaire and structured interview procedure produced equivalent rating scale data concerning adequacy of training, frequency of task performance, and supervisors' assessments of graduate proficiency. Ratings of training adequacy and frequency of task performance obtained from school graduates were equivalent to those obtained from graduates' supervisors. In the short run, questionnaires were least expensive for data collection, and job knowledge tests were the most expensive. Over the long term, with larger populations of graduates, job knowledge tests became less expensive while structured interview costs remained high. Selection of methods for data collection must also consider the specific information needs to be met, plus the relative power of each method for producing the needed information. (Author/MH) |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |