Suche

Wo soll gesucht werden?
Erweiterte Literatursuche

Ariadne Pfad:

Inhalt

Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige

 
Autor/inVallance, Elizabeth
TitelA Deadpan Look at Humor in Curriculum Theory (Or, The Serious vs. the Solemn).
Quelle(1979), (16 Seiten)Verfügbarkeit 
BeigabenTabellen
Spracheenglisch
Dokumenttypgedruckt; Monographie
SchlagwörterTagungsbericht; Stellungnahme; Adoption (Ideas); Adult Education; American Culture; Attitude Change; Attitudes; Bias; Concept Formation; Curriculum Development; Educational Needs; Educational Research; Elementary Secondary Education; Higher Education; Humor; Irony; Mental Rigidity; Nonverbal Communication; Research Needs; Research Problems; Speeches
AbstractEducational researchers can provide unusual perspectives to their research if they include humor and irony. Looking at topics from the reverse (the critical attitude, the aesthetic perspective) allows researchers to see patterns, details, and meanings which are normally hidden from view. This aesthetic perspective enables artists, critics, and researchers to find something compelling in ordinary situations. It is essential that artists and researchers discern aesthetically interesting patterns before they transmit the patterns to readers or viewers. Because educators and educational researchers are more likely to judge research and teaching methods by scientific criteria (reliability, validity, replicability, etc.) than by aesthetic criteria, their research seldom encourages new and aesthetically pleasing perspectives. The columnist Russell Baker is one example of a writer who has made the distinction between the serious (traditional, influential, non-defensive), the solemn (pretentious, self-conscious), and the humorous. Baker characterizes Americans as possessing a solemn national attitude. Certainly, educational researchers exhibit this same shortcoming to a considerable degree. Educational researchers will improve their research if they consider distinctions between serious and solemn topics and if they apply these distinctions as criteria in judging research problems, research methodology, and teaching methods. (DB)
Erfasst vonERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update2004/1/01
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
 

Standortunabhängige Dienste
Da keine ISBN zur Verfügung steht, konnte leider kein (weiterer) URL generiert werden.
Bitte rufen Sie die Eingabemaske des Karlsruher Virtuellen Katalogs (KVK) auf
Dort haben Sie die Möglichkeit, in zahlreichen Bibliothekskatalogen selbst zu recherchieren.
Tipps zum Auffinden elektronischer Volltexte im Video-Tutorial

Trefferlisten Einstellungen

Permalink als QR-Code

Permalink als QR-Code

Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)

Teile diese Seite: