Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/in | Ayers, Jerry B. |
---|---|
Institution | Tennessee Technological Univ., Cookeville. |
Titel | Tennessee Technological University Teacher Evaluation Model-Year III. Study of the Teacher Preparation Programs of Tennessee Technological University. Report No.76-1. |
Quelle | (1976), (92 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
Beigaben | Tabellen |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Monographie |
Schlagwörter | Classroom Observation Techniques; Comparative Analysis; Data Analysis; Graduate Surveys; Program Development; Program Evaluation; Student Evaluation; Teacher Education; Teacher Education Curriculum; Teacher Evaluation |
Abstract | In 1973-74 Tennessee Technological University developed and implemented a Teacher Evaluation Model for systematic data gathering and evaluating its programs in teacher education. This report presents the findings of the third year of the application of the model. The purposes of this study are: (1) to provide information for faculty and administrators in the university's teacher education program in making decisions pertinent to curriculum evaluation and development; (2) to aid in the process of making long-range plans for improving the total program of the university with particular emphasis on the teacher education program, and (3) to continue the development and refinement of the Teacher Evaluation Model. Chapter 1 presents the procedures followed in the study. Chapter 2 contains a presentation and analysis of data for those individuals who received their B.S. in 1975 and were in their first year of the study. Information pertinent to those who received the M.A. in 1975 is presented in Chapter 3, and comparisons of data obtained in the current year of the study with data obtained in past years is presented in Chapter 4. Chapter 5 summarizes the total evaluative study conducted during the 1975-76 school year, draws conclusions based on the findings of the study, and makes recommendations relative to the findings. A short summary of plans for the continuation of the study is discussed in Chapter 6. Fifty-three tables of data are included, and a list of related reports is given in the appendix. (SK) |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2004/1/01 |