Summative Evaluation of United States Office of Education, Region III, Staff Development Project in Adult Education. Final Report.

Autor/in	Divita, Charles, Jr.
Institution	Office of Education (DHEW), Philadelphia, PA. Regional Office 3.
Titel	Summative Evaluation of United States Office of Education, Region III, Staff Development Project in Adult Education. Final Report.
Quelle	(1975), (251 Seiten) PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Monographie
Schlagwörter	Adult Education; Adult Educators; Evaluation Criteria; Evaluation Methods; Program Evaluation; Regional Programs; Staff Development; State Programs; Summative Evaluation + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Adult; Adults; Education; Adult basic education; Adult training; Erwachsenenbildung; Adult education teacher; Adult education; Teacher; Teachers; Adult educator; Erwachsenenbildner; Lehrer; Lehrerin; Lehrende; Programme evaluation; Programmevaluation; Regional program; Regional programme; Regionalprogramm; Personnel development; Personalentwicklung; Regierungsprogramm
Abstract	A description and analysis of the outcomes of a three year project designed to create a long-term education staff development system throughout Region 3 is presented in the evaluation report. Region-wide evaluation, indicating considerable progress resulting from the project, was based on 63 criteria developed by project participants. State by State case studies tabulate, report, and analyze data derived from external and self-evaluative activities and from on-site visitations conducted by peers from neighboring States in the light of eight regional project objectives for each State. The objectives were to: (1) establish at least one adult education staff development program in an institution of higher learning; (2) increase the number, scope, and quality of training resources; (3) develop a commitment to and methodology for maintenance of a regional staff development program; (4) develop adult education programs, agencies, and organizations and implement staff development coordination regionally and Statewide; (5) develop local educational opportunities; (6) relate to the total adult education community; (7) enhance adult education status within State governments; (8) develop an adult education training model. The evaluation instrument and highlights of the data analysis are appended. (LH)
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC