Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/in | Lanigan, Richard L. |
---|---|
Titel | The "Speech Act" Paradigm in Current Analytic Philosophy. |
Quelle | (1974), (9 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
Beigaben | Tabellen |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Monographie |
Schlagwörter | Tagungsbericht; Communication (Thought Transfer); Educational Research; Information Theory; Interaction; Interaction Process Analysis; Interpersonal Relationship; Role Perception; Speech Communication; thought; Kommunikation; Gedanke; Bildungsforschung; Pädagogische Forschung; Informationstheorie; Interaktion; Prozessanalyse; Interpersonal relation; Interpersonal relations; Interpersonelle Beziehung; Zwischenmenschliche Beziehung; Role conception; Rollenverständnis; Speaking; Sprechen |
Abstract | The paper presents a nontechnical analysis of the philosophical theory of speech acts as a paradigmatic explanation of interpersonal communication. A contrast is drawn between the idea that meaning is "in people" and the speech act theory that meaning is an interpersonal construct. There are nine conditions of interpersonal communication that must exist for a statement to have meaning to a speaker and a listener: both persons speak the same language; the speaker articulates a promise in the sentence uttered; in expressing that promise the speaker obligates himself to a future act; both the speaker and the listener have a clear preference for the speaker keeping his promise; the promise predicates a future act that normally would not happen without the making of the promise; the speaker is sincere in his purpose: the speaker intends that the utterance of the sentence will place him under an obligation to do the future act; the speaker intends to produce in the listener the knowledge that the utterance of the sentence places the speaker under an obligation to do the future act; and the semantical rules of the dialect spoken by the speaker and the listener are such that the sentence is correctly and sincerely uttered. (WR) |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2004/1/01 |