Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
| Autor/inn/en | Krakower, Jack; Hoepfner, Ralph |
|---|---|
| Institution | California Univ., Los Angeles. Center for the Study of Evaluation. |
| Titel | A Comparison of Procedures for Determining Goal Priorities. [Report No.: CSE-R-90 |
| Quelle | (1974), (28 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei |
| Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Monographie |
| Schlagwörter | Classification; Comparative Analysis; Educational Needs; Educational Objectives; Elementary Schools; Principals |
| Abstract | An attempt is made to determine whether a procedure requiring each member of a rating group to rank a subset of fifteen goals selected at random from one hundred and six goals would produce results that were, in effect, equivalent to having each member of a rating group rate each of the one hundred and six goals. The ratings of the one hundred and six goals by fifty-three California elementary school principals obtained during a field testing were used to provide the standard against which the results of the subset ranking procedures was to be compared since the sampling of each group was largely incidental and no provision was made for equating or randomizing administrators between the two rating groups, differences observed might be influenced by extraneous variables. The subset ranking procedure (SRK) yields results that are equivalent to those obtained with complete rating or ranking procedures. However, it seems inappropriate at this time to either recommend or reject the use of the SRK or any other subset procedure as a substitute for complete rating/ranking procedures until the potential problem of rater dissatisfaction can be investigated. (Author/BB) |
| Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
| Update | 2004/1/01 |
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
Permalink als QR-Code
Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)
Teile diese Seite:
