Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Markley, O. W.; und weitere |
---|---|
Institution | Stanford Research Inst., Menlo Park, CA. Educational Policy Research Center. |
Titel | A Needs Assessment for Educational R&D. |
Quelle | (1972), (64 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Monographie |
Schlagwörter | Archives; Educational Assessment; Educational Development; Educational Objectives; Educational Planning; Educational Problems; Educational Research; Elementary Schools; Futures (of Society); Higher Education; Needs; Secondary Schools Archivwesen; Archiv; Education; assessment; Bewertungssystem; Bildungsentwicklung; Educational objective; Bildungsziel; Erziehungsziel; Bildungsplanung; Bildungsforschung; Pädagogische Forschung; Elementary school; Grundschule; Volksschule; Future; Society; Zukunft; Hochschulbildung; Hochschulsystem; Hochschulwesen; Grundbedürfnis; Sekundarschule |
Abstract | This report presents the results of an effort to translate future-oriented research and other thinking into a structured set of program goals for National Institute of Education (NIE) consideration. A variety of societal trends are presented to illustrate the conclusion that new roles of education and educational R&D are of central importance to the achievement of a desirable future. Educational problems and needs that were culled from a variety of sources are categorized as being either chronic, acute, or adaptive in nature. The reasoning underlying this approach is that while chronic problems need some attention and acute problems seem most demanding, the prevention of problems from becoming acute should be a key consideration in R&D programing. The importance of adaptive problems (the stresses resulting from the rapid rate of change in virtually all sectors of society) is that they offer identifiable areas that have not yet, but that are likely to, become acute without corrective attention. The main body of the report concludes with a set of goals derived from 21 selected problems and an outline of work proposed for the remainder of a 3-month effort. Supporting analyses are presented in several appendixes. (Author) |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |