LEARNING FROM OWN VS OTHER VOICE BY AIR OR BONE CONDUCTION.

Autor/in	YEAGER, JOY
Institution	Harvard Univ., Cambridge, MA. Graduate School of Education.
Titel	LEARNING FROM OWN VS OTHER VOICE BY AIR OR BONE CONDUCTION.
Quelle	(1966), (6 Seiten) PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Monographie
Schlagwörter	Auditory Perception; Comparative Analysis; Hearing (Physiology); Learning Processes; Paired Associate Learning; Recall (Psychology); Research and Development Centers + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Auditive Wahrnehmung; Akustische Wahrnehmung; Akustik; Gehör; Hören; Learning process; Lernprozess; Abberufung; Forschungszentrum
Abstract	IN A PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING EXPERIMENT, THE SUBJECT'S OWN VOICE AND THEN THAT OF ANOTHER WERE HEARD TO TEST THE EFFECTIVENESS OF RECALL OF BOTH PRESENTATIONS. HALF OF THE WORDS FROM EACH VOICE WAS PRESENTED BY AIR-CONDUCTED SOUND TO EARPHONES AND HALF BY OCCLUDED BONE CONDUCTION. THE ORDER OF PRESENTATION OF VOICES, WORD-PAIR HALF-BLOCKS, AND SOUND MEDIA WAS COUNTERBALANCED AMONG SUBJECTS WHO WERE PREVIOUSLY SCREENED FOR NORMAL HEARING. TESTS WERE ADMINISTERED TO DIFFERENTIATE SUBJECTS WHO WERE EITHER "FIELD DEPENDENT" OR "FIELD INDEPENDENT." RESULTS SHOWED THAT RECALL OF MATERIAL WAS NO GREATER WHETHER ONE'S OWN VOICE OR ANOTHER'S WAS USED. SUBJECTS CLASSIFIED AS NORMAL, OR AS "FIELD DEPENDENT," LEARNED ABOUT EQUALLY WELL FROM EITHER VOICE AND SHOWED NO PREFERENCE FOR ONE OVER THE OTHER. IN THE EARLY TRIALS, LEARNING BY AIR CONDUCTION APPEARED SUPERIOR TO THAT BY BONE CONDUCTION. IN LATER TRIALS, THE DIFFERENCE BECAME NONSIGNIFICANT. THIS ARTICLE WAS PUBLISHED IN "PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS," 23, 1966. (GD)
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC