Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Hechler, Daniel; Pasternack, Peer |
---|---|
Titel | Best Practice und Worst Case? Der Umgang mit der Hochschulzeitgeschichte an der Universität Jena und der Humboldt-Universität - ein exemplarischer Vergleich. Paralleltitel: Best Practice vs. Worst Case? How East German Universities Deal with their Contemporary History: the Humboldt University of Berlin and the University of Jena. |
Quelle | In: Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte, 34 (2011) 4, S. 329-345Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
Beigaben | Anmerkungen 53; Illustrationen |
Sprache | deutsch |
Dokumenttyp | online; gedruckt; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 0170-6233; 1522-2365 |
DOI | 10.1002/bewi.201101539 |
Schlagwörter | Vergleich; Bildungsgeschichte; Hochschulgeschichte; Öffentlichkeitsarbeit; Geschichte (Histor); Zeitgeschichte; Humboldt-Universität; Universität; Hochschulpolitik; Hochschule; 20. Jahrhundert; 21. Jahrhundert; Auseinandersetzung; Berlin; Deutschland-DDR; Deutschland-Östliche Länder; Jena |
Abstract | East German universities are often criticized for a lack of efforts to come to terms with their own history in the GDR. Two universities are regularly compared to illustrate the chances and shortcomings in this field: while the University of Jena is considered as very active in dealing with their own contemporary history the Humboldt University of Berlin is claimed to have substantial deficits. As a part of a general survey of the efforts of East German universities concerning their own contemporary history this contrastive picture is examined. It can be shown that the main differences between the two universities are less the intensity of historical self-reflection but rather the thematic focus and the forms of presentation. (HoF/text adopted). |
Erfasst von | Institut für Hochschulforschung (HoF) an der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg |
Update | 2012/3 |