Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/in | Popham, W. James |
---|---|
Titel | Classroom assessment. What teachers need to know. 6. ed. |
Quelle | Boston u.a.: Pearson (2011), XVIII, 510 S. |
Beigaben | Illustrationen |
Zusatzinformation | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; Monographie |
ISBN | 0-13-700233-5; 978-0-13-700233-7 |
Schlagwörter | Evaluation; Reliabilität; Selbstevaluation; Testkonstruktion; Validität; Einstellung (Psy); Leistungssteigerung; Urteil; Verhalten; Vorurteil; Multiple-Choice-Verfahren; Testaufgabe; Testauswertung; Testtheorie; Eltern; Lehrer; Schüler; Leistungsbeurteilung; Schulnote; Schülerleistung; Beispiel; Lernziel; Aufgabensammlung; Unterrichtsprozess; Lehrbuch; Englisch als Zweitsprache; Benachteiligung; Effektivität; Portfolio; Qualität; Standard |
Abstract | [The 6th edition of this book offers] ... a practical approach rich with real classroom strategies and applications, and an authoritative, research-based overview of classroom assessment. ... In addition to covering expertly the field of classroom assessment, this text continues to give students ample opportunities, in the "Decision Time" activities, to evaluate realistic classroom scenarios and to make informed decisions about testing and assessment based on what they've learned in each chapter. It also retains the... feature, "Parent Talk," so new teachers can learn effective ways to communicate with parents about their children's grades and educational progress. ... Chapter 12 introduces a new formative assessment procedure that can improve classroom teachers' instructional effectiveness. Chapters 15 and 16 now divide the subject of grading to cover separately and in detail ways in which teachers can evaluate their own teaching and its impact on student progress and grades and how to grade students fairly and usefully. "Extended Applications" appear at the end of the book and provide rich cases where students can apply what they've learned to authentic educational situations. (DIPF/Orig.). |
Erfasst von | DIPF | Leibniz-Institut für Bildungsforschung und Bildungsinformation, Frankfurt am Main |
Update | 2010/4 |