Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
| Autor/inn/en | Falchikov, Nancy; Goldfinch, Judy |
|---|---|
| Titel | Student peer assessment in higher education. A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. |
| Quelle | In: Review of educational research, 70 (2000) 3, S. 287-322Infoseite zur Zeitschrift |
| Beigaben | Literaturangaben 79; Tabellen 9; Grafiken 2 |
| Sprache | englisch; englische Zusammenfassung |
| Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
| ISSN | 0034-6543 |
| Schlagwörter | Evaluation; Metaanalyse; Quantitative Forschung; Selbstevaluation; Vergleichsuntersuchung; Forschungsstand; Hochschule; Gültigkeit; Leistungsmessung; Literaturbericht; Student; USA |
| Abstract | Forty-eight quantitative peer assessment studies comparing peer and teacher marks were subjected to meta-analysis. Peer assessments were found to resemble more closely teacher assessments when global judgements based on well understood criteria are used rather than when marking involves assessing several individual dimensions. Similarly, peer assessments better resemble faculty assessments when academic products and processes, rather than professional practice, are being rated. ... Hypotheses concerning the greater validity of peer assessments in advanced rather than beginner courses and in science and engineering rather than in other discipline areas were not supported. In addition, multiple ratings were not found to be better than ratings by singletons. The study pointed to differences between self and peer assessments, which are explored briefly. (DIPF/orig.) |
| Erfasst von | DIPF | Leibniz-Institut für Bildungsforschung und Bildungsinformation, Frankfurt am Main |
| Update | 2002_(CD) |
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
Permalink als QR-Code
Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)
Teile diese Seite:
