Recovery of Expert Fees in Special Education Due Process Hearings

Autor/inn/en	Yell, Mitchell L.; Katsiyannis, Antonis; Ryan, Joseph B.; McDuffie, Kimberly
Titel	Recovery of Expert Fees in Special Education Due Process Hearings
Quelle	In: Intervention in School and Clinic, 44 (2008) 2, S.112-115 (4 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1053-4512
DOI	10.1177/1053451208321601
Schlagwörter	Parent Rights; Civil Rights; Hearings; School Districts; Special Education; Fees; Court Litigation; Federal Courts; Expertise + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Elternrecht; Bürgerrechte; Grundrechte; Zivilrecht; School district; Schulbezirk; Special needs education; Sonderpädagogik; Sonderschulwesen; Gebühren; Studiengebühren; Rechtsstreit; Bundesgerichtshof; Expert appraisal
Abstract	The U.S. Supreme Court issued three rulings in special education cases during the past 2 years. Considering that in the previous 25 years, the high court had issued only 14 rulings, these three decisions represent a significant increase in the special education cases heard by the Court. These important rulings all addressed parental rights in due process hearings. The cases were as follows: (1) "Schaffer v. Weast" (2005); (2) "Winkelman v. Parma City Schools" (2007); and (3) "Arlington Central School District Board of Education v. Murphy" (2006). The first two cases, "Schaffer v. Weast" and "Winkelman v. Parma City Schools," provide a context for understanding the third case, "Arlington Central School District Board of Education v. Murphy," which is the focus of this article. (ERIC).
Anmerkungen	SAGE Publications and Hammill Institute on Disabilities. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: http://sagepub.com
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10