Engaging Refugee Women and Girls as Experts: Co-Creating Evidence on Sexual Exploitation and Abuse in Humanitarian Crises Using Creative, Participatory Methods

Autor/inn/en	Potts, Alina; Fattal, Loujine; Kolli, Harriet
Titel	Engaging Refugee Women and Girls as Experts: Co-Creating Evidence on Sexual Exploitation and Abuse in Humanitarian Crises Using Creative, Participatory Methods
Quelle	In: Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 18 (2022) 2, S.311-335 (25 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1744-2648
Schlagwörter	Refugees; Females; Expertise; Sexual Abuse; Crime; At Risk Persons; Power Structure; Experience; Participation; Foreign Countries; Employees; Behavior; Participatory Research; Action Research; Victims of Crime; Story Telling; Drama; Freehand Drawing; Maps; Barriers; Syria; South Sudan; Uganda; Lebanon + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Flüchtling; Weibliches Geschlecht; Expert appraisal; Sexueller Missbrauch; Crimes; Delict; Delicts; Delikt; Risikogruppe; Erfahrung; Teilnahme; Ausland; Employee; Arbeitnehmer; Beschäftigter; Forschungstätigkeit; Projektforschung; Victim; Victims; Crime; Opfer; Verbrechen; Schauspiel; Drawing; Zeichnen; Map; Karte; Syrien; Libanon
Abstract	Background: Humanitarian evidence is produced in settings of heightened power imbalances between research stakeholders. Yet evidence production processes often lack explicit reflection of who is shaping the questions asked and making meaning of the answers. Aims and objectives: Empowered Aid is participatory action research that seeks to mitigate sexual exploitation and abuse (SEA) perpetrated by aid actors. Refugee women and girls in Uganda and Lebanon, as experts on SEA risk, are engaged co-researchers in generating evidence on how to make aid distributions safer. Methods: Diverse creative processes are utilised to co-produce knowledge about SEA risks and strategies to reduce them. These same processes are used to reflect on power dynamics within the research process itself, local gender power dynamics, and structural power dynamics between aid actors and those receiving aid. Findings: Fifty-five Syrian and South Sudanese refugee women and girl co-researchers used ethnographic methods to document their and their peers' lived experiences of SEA risks while accessing humanitarian aid. Creative methods including drawing, drama, storytelling, community mapping, and body mapping were applied during data collection and qualitative analysis, as well as in reflection and action analysis workshops. SEA was reported across all the types of aid studied, and these findings are being used to adapt aid distribution processes. Discussion and conclusions: Creative and participatory practices can address the barriers, such as illiteracy (including computer illiteracy) and lack of training, often cited as limiting researchers' ability to share power with affected communities, and allow for greater co-production of knowledge and evidence. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Policy Press, an imprint of Bristol University Press. University of Bristol, 1-9 Old Park Hill, Bristol BS2 8BB, UK. Tel: +44-117-954-5940; e-mail: pp-info@policypress.co.uk; Web site: https://policy.bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/journals/evidence-and-policy
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01