Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Lebersfeld, Jenna B.; Swanson, Marissa; Clesi, Christian D.; O'Kelley, Sarah E. |
---|---|
Titel | Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Clinical Utility of the ADOS-2 and the ADI-R in Diagnosing Autism Spectrum Disorders in Children |
Quelle | In: Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 51 (2021) 11, S.4101-4114 (14 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 0162-3257 |
DOI | 10.1007/s10803-020-04839-z |
Schlagwörter | Autism; Diagnostic Tests; Observation; Pervasive Developmental Disorders; Accuracy; Meta Analysis; Usability; Children; Clinical Diagnosis; Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule |
Abstract | The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, Second Edition (ADOS-2) and the Autism Diagnostic Interview, Revised (ADI-R) have high accuracy as diagnostic instruments in research settings, while evidence of accuracy in clinical settings is less robust. This meta-analysis focused on efficacy of these measures in research versus clinical settings. Articles (n = 22) were analyzed using a hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics (HSROC) model. ADOS-2 performance was stronger than the ADI-R. ADOS-2 sensitivity and specificity ranged from 0.89-0.92 and 0.81-0.85, respectively. ADOS-2 accuracy in research compared with clinical settings was mixed. ADI-R sensitivity and specificity were 0.75 and 0.82, respectively, with higher specificity in research samples (Research = 0.85, Clinical = 0.72). A small number of clinical studies were identified, indicating ongoing need for investigation outside research settings. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/ |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2024/1/01 |