Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
| Autor/inn/en | Bakhtiar, Mehdi; Wong, Min Ney; Tsui, Emily Ka Yin; McNeil, Malcolm R. |
|---|---|
| Titel | Development of the English Listening and Reading Computerized Revised Token Test into Cantonese: Validity, Reliability, and Sensitivity/Specificity in People with Aphasia and Healthy Controls |
| Quelle | In: Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 63 (2020) 11, S.3743-3759 (17 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
| Zusatzinformation | ORCID (Bakhtiar, Mehdi) |
| Sprache | englisch |
| Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
| ISSN | 1092-4388 |
| Schlagwörter | Psychometrics; Sino Tibetan Languages; Computer Assisted Testing; Aphasia; Comparative Analysis; Language Tests; Scores; English; Translation; Reading Tests; Listening Comprehension Tests; Adults; Correlation; Test Reliability; Test Validity; Cutting Scores; Older Adults; Test Construction; Foreign Countries; Hong Kong |
| Abstract | Purpose: This study reports the psychometric development of the Cantonese versions of the English Computerized Revised Token Test (CRTT) for persons with aphasia (PWAs) and healthy controls (HCs). Method: The English CRTT was translated into standard Chinese for the Reading--Word Fade version (CRTT-R-[subscript WF]-Cantonese) and into formal Cantonese for the Listening version (CRTT-L-Cantonese). Thirty-two adult native Cantonese PWAs and 42 HCs were tested on both versions of CRTT-Cantonese tests and on the Cantonese Aphasia Battery to measure the construct and concurrent validity of CRTT-Cantonese tests. The HCs were retested on both versions of the CRTT-Cantonese tests, whereas the PWAs were randomly assigned for retesting on either version to measure the test--retest reliability. Results: A two-way, Group × Modality, repeated-measures analysis of variance revealed significantly lower scores for the PWA group than the HC group for both reading and listening. Other comparisons were not significant. A high and significant correlation was found between the CRTT-R-[subscript WF]-Cantonese and the CRTT-L-Cantonese in PWAs, and 87% of the PWAs showed nonsignificantly different performance across the CRTT-Cantonese tests based on the Revised Standardized Difference Test. The CRTT-R-[subscript WF]-Cantonese provided better aphasia diagnostic sensitivity (100%) and specificity (83.30%) values than the CRTT-L-Cantonese. Pearson correlation coefficients revealed significant moderate correlations between the Cantonese Aphasia Battery scores and the CRTT-Cantonese tests in PWAs, supporting adequate concurrent validity. Intraclass correlation coefficient showed high test-retest reliability (between 0.82 and 0.96, p < 0.001) for both CRTT-Cantonese tests for both groups. Conclusions: Results support that the validly translated CRTT-R-[subscript WF]-Cantonese and CRTT-L-Cantonese tests significantly differentiate the reading and listening comprehension of PWAs from HCs and provides acceptable concurrent validity and high test-retest reliability for both tests. Furthermore, favorable PWA versus HC sensitivity and specificity cutoff scores are presented for both CRTT-Cantonese listening and reading tests. (As Provided). |
| Anmerkungen | American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. 2200 Research Blvd #250, Rockville, MD 20850. Tel: 301-296-5700; Fax: 301-296-8580; e-mail: slhr@asha.org; Web site: http://jslhr.pubs.asha.org |
| Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
| Update | 2024/1/01 |
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
Permalink als QR-Code
Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)
Teile diese Seite:
