A Meta-Analysis of the Relation between Creative Self-Efficacy and Different Creativity Measurements

Autor/inn/en	Haase, Jennifer; Hoff, Eva V.; Hanel, Paul H. P.; Innes-Ker, Åse
Titel	A Meta-Analysis of the Relation between Creative Self-Efficacy and Different Creativity Measurements
Quelle	In: Creativity Research Journal, 30 (2018) 1, S.1-16 (16 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Hoff, Eva V.) ORCID (Hanel, Paul H. P.) ORCID (Innes-Ker, Åse)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1040-0419
DOI	10.1080/10400419.2018.1411436
Schlagwörter	Creativity; Self Efficacy; Creativity Tests; Meta Analysis; Questionnaires; Self Evaluation (Individuals); Effect Size; Creative Thinking; Objective Tests; Correlation; Statistical Analysis; Literature Reviews; Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking; Remote Associates Test + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Kreativität; Self-efficacy; Selbstwirksamkeit; Creativity test; Kreativitätstest; Meta-analysis; Metaanalyse; Fragebogen; Kreatives Denken; Objektiver Test; Korrelation; Statistische Analyse
Abstract	This meta-analysis investigated the relations between creative self-efficacy (CSE) and creativity measures and hypothesized that self-assessed questionnaires would have a different relation to self-efficacy beliefs compared to other creativity tests. The meta-analysis synthesized 60 effect sizes from 41 papers (overall N = 17226). Taken as a whole, the relation between CSE and creativity measures was of medium size (r = 0.39). Subgroup analyses revealed that self-rated creativity correlated higher with self-efficacy (r = 0.53). The relation with divergent thinking (DT) tests was weak (r = 0.23). Creativity scales had a medium size relation (r = 0.43), and was stronger than the relation to verbal performance tasks (r = 0.27) and figural performance tasks (r = 0.19). In a comparison between measures focusing on the creative person (r = 0.47), the creative product (r = 0.32), and the creative process (r = 0.27), the person aspect was most strongly linked to CSE. Thus, the relation between self-efficacy and creativity measures is dependent on the type of measurement used, emphasizing the need for researchers to distinguish between different instruments--not the least between self-report scales and more objective test procedures. Conceptual implications are discussed and critique concerning the creativity concept is brought up. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01