Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/in | Shannon, David M. |
---|---|
Titel | An Evaluation Approach for the Development of Preservice Teachers. |
Quelle | (1994), (20 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Monographie |
Schlagwörter | Decision Making; Elementary Secondary Education; Evaluation Methods; Higher Education; Portfolio Assessment; Preservice Teacher Education; Problem Solving; Program Implementation; Simulation; Student Teacher Evaluation; Student Teachers; Student Teaching; Teaching Skills Decision-making; Entscheidungsfindung; Hochschulbildung; Hochschulsystem; Hochschulwesen; Portfoliobeurteilung; Lehramtsstudiengang; Lehrerausbildung; Problemlösen; Simulation program; Simulationsprogramm; Lehramtsstudent; Lehramtsstudentin; Referendar; Referendarin; Teaching practice; Unterrichtspraxis; Lehrbefähigung; Lehrkompetenz; Unterrichtsbefähigung |
Abstract | This paper provides an overview of a teacher evaluation system designed to improve the education of preservice teachers at Auburn University (Alabama) by promoting self-assessment, reflection, and professional growth. The system uses a portfolio approach which includes a simulation exercise in pedagogical decision making. The portfolio contains five required college-wide components, as well as program-specific components and supplemental components determined by individual students. The five college-wide components include a professional resume, self-evaluation, most successful lesson plan, least successful lesson plan, and student evaluation instrument. The simulation exercise uses the Simulation of Interactive Decision-Making, in which problem situations are offered along with three or more suggested responses and the student evaluates the appropriateness of each response. The paper reviews methods traditionally used in teacher evaluation; issues a call for alternatives such as portfolios and simulation exercises; discusses issues in establishing and implementing a portfolio-based system, including the perspectives of interns, university supervisors, and educational employers on theoretical and practical concerns; discusses revisions made to the portfolio process to further integrate it within the teacher education curriculum; and provides an overview of the development and revision of the simulation component. (Contains 51 references.) (JDD) |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |