The Teacher as Street-Level Bureaucrat: Science Teacher's Discretionary Decision-Making in a Time of Reform

Autor/inn/en	Hall, M.; Hampden-Thompson, G.
Titel	The Teacher as Street-Level Bureaucrat: Science Teacher's Discretionary Decision-Making in a Time of Reform
Quelle	In: International Journal of Science Education, 44 (2022) 6, S.980-999 (20 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Hall, M.)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0950-0693
DOI	10.1080/09500693.2022.2059588
Schlagwörter	Science Teachers; Decision Making; Educational Change; Science Curriculum; Elementary School Teachers; Secondary School Teachers; Foreign Countries; Professional Autonomy; Educational Policy; Teacher Role; Instructional Leadership; Teaching Methods; United Kingdom (England) + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Science; Teacher; Teachers; Science teacher; Wissenschaft; Lehrer; Lehrerin; Lehrende; Decision-making; Entscheidungsfindung; Bildungsreform; Elementary school; Grundschule; Volksschule; Ausland; Berufsfreiheit; Politics of education; Bildungspolitik; Lehrerrolle; Instruction; Leadership; Bildung; Erziehung; Führung; Teaching method; Lehrmethode; Unterrichtsmethode
Abstract	This article explores teacher discretion in the context of the English 2014 science curriculum and assessment reforms. The study positions primary and secondary school science teachers as "street-level bureaucrats" in which they are not just mere implementers of policy but instead pivotal actors with much agency. Through the analysis of questionnaire and interview data drawn from a sample of 26 science teachers in England, this empirical research advances our understanding of teachers' discretionary decision-making considering policy change and reform. The findings indicate that discretion varied, not simply between the secondary and primary sectors, but within each key stage. With the introduction of the new curriculum, secondary teachers expressed higher levels of autonomy and more discretion teaching key stage 3 than with key stage 4 and key stage 5. Despite this, we argue that it has become more difficult for teachers to circumvent the "rules" associated with the attainment measures in the ways that were previously possible. We conclude that the embodiment of teachers as street-level bureaucrats is not perfect as the boundaries around teacher's discretion and decision-making are heavily dependent on the school and national policy context, but it remains a useful theory in advancing our understanding of teacher. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01