Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Reed, Deborah K.; Whalon, Kelly; Lynn, Devon; Miller, Nicole; Smith, Keely |
---|---|
Titel | A Comparison of General and Content-Specific Literacy Strategies for Learning Science Content |
Quelle | In: Exceptionality, 25 (2017) 2, S.77-96 (20 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 0936-2835 |
DOI | 10.1080/09362835.2016.1196441 |
Schlagwörter | Biology; Science Instruction; Notetaking; Teaching Methods; High School Students; At Risk Students; Institutionalized Persons; Juvenile Justice; Correctional Education; Textbooks; Instructional Materials; Reading Skills; Program Effectiveness; Literacy Education; Males; Pretests Posttests; Reading Fluency; Knowledge Level; Intervention; Science Tests; Case Studies Biologie; Teaching of science; Science education; Natural sciences Lessons; Naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht; Teaching method; Lehrmethode; Unterrichtsmethode; High school; High schools; Student; Students; Oberschule; Schüler; Schülerin; Studentin; Jugendgerichtshilfe; Fürsorgeerziehung; Textbook; Text book; Schulbuch; Lehrbuch; Lehrmaterial; Lehrmittel; Unterrichtsmedien; Reading skill; Lesefertigkeit; Male; Männliches Geschlecht; Wissensbasis; Case study; Fallstudie; Case Study |
Abstract | This study employed an adapted alternating treatments single-case design to explore students' learning of biology content when using a general note-taking (GNT) strategy and a content-specific graphic organizer (CGO) to support reading high school biology texts. The 4 focal participants were 15-18-year-olds committed to a moderate risk juvenile justice facility. Lessons were delivered once a week for 7 weeks with CGO delivered first in odd weeks and GNT first in even weeks. When students were unfamiliar with the strategies or experiencing emotional or health problems, their weekly quiz scores tended to be higher on whichever lesson was delivered first. After stabilizing, an average ability reader did better on CGO lessons, and a student with below-average reading ability did better on GNT lessons. CGO took more time to prepare but an average of 11 minutes less than each GNT lesson to implement. CGO also was associated with more student-initiated responses and more self-reported student preferences. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2020/1/01 |