Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Marks, Peter E. L.; Babcock, Ben; van den Berg, Yvonne H. M.; Cillessen, Antonius H. N. |
---|---|
Titel | Effects of Including versus Excluding Nonparticipants as Potential Nominees in Peer Nomination Measures |
Quelle | In: International Journal of Behavioral Development, 43 (2019) 3, S.255-262 (8 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 0165-0254 |
DOI | 10.1177/0165025418798504 |
Schlagwörter | Peer Groups; Adolescents; Grade 7; Grade 8; Middle School Students; Foreign Countries; Peer Relationship; Comparative Education; Educational Research; Data Analysis; Friendship; Reliability; Peer Acceptance; Prosocial Behavior; Aggression; Simulation; Netherlands; United States Gleichaltrigengruppe; Peer Group; Adolescent; Adolescence; Adoleszenz; Jugend; Jugendalter; Jugendlicher; School year 07; 7. Schuljahr; Schuljahr 07; School year 08; 8. Schuljahr; Schuljahr 08; Middle school; Middle schools; Student; Students; Mittelschule; Mittelstufenschule; Schüler; Schülerin; Ausland; Peer-Beziehungen; Vergleichende Erziehungswissenschaft; Bildungsforschung; Pädagogische Forschung; Auswertung; Freundschaft; Reliabilität; Simulation program; Simulationsprogramm; Niederlande; USA |
Abstract | In peer nomination research, individuals who do not provide nominations (nonparticipants) are often included on rosters as potential nominees. This can present ethical questions regarding informed consent, but psychometric consequences of excluding nonparticipants from rosters are unknown. In this investigation, Study 1 simulated both random and systematic missingness with a sample of 1,630 Dutch adolescents, comparing the reliability and correlation matrices of nomination measures when nonparticipants were included and excluded as nominees. Study 2 began with a two-school sample that already included systematic nonparticipation (˜19% missingness among 599 7th grade nominees) and examined how findings would differ if students who had not provided nominations were excluded as nominees. Results showed that the impact of including versus excluding nonparticipants as nominees may vary depending on the type of missingness (Study 1) or in different peer groups (Study 2). Both studies demonstrated that the choice of including versus excluding nonparticipants can affect reliability and intercorrelations in peer nomination data, and provide some evidence that excluding nonparticipants as nominees may compromise peer nomination data quality. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: http://sagepub.com |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2020/1/01 |