Suche

Wo soll gesucht werden?
Erweiterte Literatursuche

Ariadne Pfad:

Inhalt

Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige

 
Autor/inMule, Christina Marie
TitelA Comparison of Two Sight Word Interventions: Traditional Drill and Wordsheets
Quelle(2013), (131 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit 
Ph.D. Dissertation, Northeastern University
Spracheenglisch
Dokumenttypgedruckt; online; Monographie
ISBN978-1-3033-3673-7
SchlagwörterHochschulschrift; Dissertation; Teaching Methods; Sight Vocabulary; Word Recognition; Visual Stimuli; Drills (Practice); Intervention; Outcomes of Treatment; Instructional Effectiveness; Worksheets; Instructional Materials; Generalization; Grade 1; Elementary School Students; Reading Difficulties; Maintenance
AbstractTraditional drill and practice (TDP) is a sight word intervention that is well supported in the literature as being both effective and efficient. However, with growing demands in school systems, there is increased pressure to employ interventions that enhance learning outcomes with less instructional time. WordSheets (WS) was created as a method that could potentially (a) produce better learning outcomes by increasing opportunities to respond, (b) produce better generalization than traditional approaches that present one word at a time by presenting stimuli in connected text format, and (c) be more convenient for educators by eliminating the need to manipulate flashcards. Utilizing a group design, the current study sought to compare the instructional effectiveness and efficiency of TDP and WS with a first-grade sample of students (n = 27) identified by their teachers as struggling readers. Results indicated that, although WS led to significantly more opportunities to respond, it was both less effective and efficient than TDP with regard to both retention and maintenance outcomes. However, TDP was no more effective and efficient than WS with regard to the generalization of treatment gains. Limitations and implications of the current study for school-based professionals are discussed. (As Provided).
AnmerkungenProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml
Erfasst vonERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update2020/1/01
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
 

Standortunabhängige Dienste
Die Wikipedia-ISBN-Suche verweist direkt auf eine Bezugsquelle Ihrer Wahl.
Tipps zum Auffinden elektronischer Volltexte im Video-Tutorial

Trefferlisten Einstellungen

Permalink als QR-Code

Permalink als QR-Code

Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)

Teile diese Seite: