Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Porter, Dennis; Kissam, Edward |
---|---|
Institution | Adult Education Inst. for Research and Planning, Sacramento, CA.; Pacific Management and Research Associates, Sacramento, CA. |
Titel | Funding for Innovation and Performance. Working Paper on Strategic Recommendation 2. Advisory Review Draft. |
Quelle | (1990), (97 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Monographie |
Schlagwörter | Stellungnahme; Access to Education; Adult Education; Computer Assisted Instruction; Cooperative Programs; Educational Administration; Educational Finance; Educational Innovation; Educational Technology; Nontraditional Education; On the Job Training; Tutoring; California Education; Access; Bildung; Zugang; Bildungszugang; Adult; Adults; Adult basic education; Adult training; Erwachsenenbildung; Computer based training; Computerunterstützter Unterricht; Bildungsverwaltung; Schuladministration; Schulverwaltung; Bildungsfonds; Instructional innovation; Bildungsinnovation; Unterrichtsmedien; Non-traditional education; Alternative Erziehung; Training-on-the-Job; Förderkonzept; Nachhilfeunterricht; Kalifornien |
Abstract | This document addresses issues concerning the development of innovative and performance-based methods to fund adult education, which was a recommendation in the 1989 California Strategic Plan for Adult Education. Specifically, it was recommended that funding policies and mechanisms be adjusted to allow and encourage "any-time, any-place, on-demand" instruction through: (1) the use of instructional technologies such as computer-assisted instruction and televised courses; (2) innovative and nontraditional educational methods such as tutoring and on-the-job training; and (3) collaborative programs. In addition, it was recommended that funding be linked to performance. Chapter 1 offers a history and summary of the recommendation and lists its objectives. Chapter 2 is a review of relevant literature. Chapter 3 covers issues surrounding the recommendation and options for its implementation. They include obtaining legislative authority to test models, adopting the independent study approach as a basis for nontraditional adult education, developing a cafeteria plan of reimbursement options, developing a statistically reliable model for measuring learner competencies, and using EduCard (the Adult Education Access Card, an educational recordkeeping and information system) to facilitate public-private and cross-agency ventures. Recommendations appear in Chapter 4. Chapter 5 summarizes the preceding chapters. (CML) |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |