Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | McClellan, L. Dean; Newton, Robert E. |
---|---|
Institution | Louisville Univ., KY. School of Education.; Morehead State Univ., KY. School of Education. |
Titel | Forecasting and Analyzing Needs and Barriers in Kentucky Vocational Education. Final Report. |
Quelle | (1977), (88 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Monographie |
Schlagwörter | Access to Education; Community Involvement; Disadvantaged; Educational Change; Educational Needs; Educational Problems; Financial Support; Futures (of Society); Government Role; Minority Groups; Social Change; Staff Development; State Surveys; Statewide Planning; Teacher Education; Technological Advancement; Vocational Education; Kentucky Education; Access; Bildung; Zugang; Bildungszugang; Bildungsreform; Educational need; Bildungsbedarf; Finanzielle Förderung; Future; Society; Zukunft; Ethnische Minderheit; Sozialer Wandel; Personnel development; Personalentwicklung; Planwirtschaft; Lehrerausbildung; Lehrerbildung; Technological development; Technologische Entwicklung; Ausbildung; Berufsbildung |
Abstract | Objectives of a Kentucky project were to analyze existing needs and barriers and potential needs and barriers regarding (1) new and emerging occupations, (2) elimination of discrimination, (3) vocational staff development, and (4) funding vocational education. A statewide planning committee assisted in development of the method and instruments. A Delphi questionnaire was developed and sent to samples of personnel from seven different groups of vocational educators and policy makers in the state. Response and feedback was synthesized and analyzed to determine commonalities and differences, and participants were then asked to reach a consensus of opinion regarding each of ten issues. Results identify future needs and barriers in the following categories: influence of technological and scientific advancements; effects of social changes; how to improve community involvement; role of local, state, and federal government; response to future occupational trends and innovations; how to meet the needs of minorities, disadvantaged, and handicapped; future educational strategies; identification of future problems; occupations which will be eliminated; and need for greater access to occupational education. (Statistical results and description of responses to each question are included along with related recommendations.) (JT) |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |